Excellent scale-up of 'End of Serenity' smoke plume, proving it's not from a '757 crash'

Excellent piece of research done back in Feb '07 by nick7261 comparing the smoke plume in the Val McClatchey photo with the explosion coming out of the WTC 2.

Remember, Flight 175 supposedly had 65% more fuel left than Flight 93 supposedly did upon impact and most of Flight 93 supposedly had buried deep into the ground, so fast that it didn’t have a chance to burn!

Analysis by 'rSpieker' annihilates 'End of Serenity' photo

I finally put up a great analysis by 9/11 researcher rSpieker which, as he poignantly puts it, spells the definite "End of Serenity" of a certain picture.

YouTube pulls two 'Flight 93 plume' videos

Read about it here.


--------------------------------

Update 09/23/08:

Shure's forum PumpItOut gets pulled for "TOS violations."

Year anniversary of Shanksville local claiming 'Flight 93 plume photo' is fake

Some of you still might not know this, but one year ago, a local Shanksville resident, who was one of the witnesses who reportedly saw Flight 93 in the air before it allegedly crashed, confirmed that Val McClatchey's infamous "End of Serenity" photo is fake:

Jeff: Val McClatchey... she has a famous photo.
Ms. Leverknight: It was a fake photo, because it didn't have a mushroom cloud.
Jeff: It what?
Ms. Leverknight: There was no mushroom cloud.
Jeff: So it was a fake photo?
Ms. Leverknight: Yeah.
Jeff: Her photo's faked?
Ms. Leverknight: Yeah.
Jeff: For what? For money?
Ms. Leverknight: Yeah.
Jeff: Why, do you know that for sure?
Ms. Leverknight: Yeah!

Mega props to DJ Shure for making that call!

Has Val's infamous 'Flight 93' photo been vindicated by amateur footage?

That's the rumor.

McClatchey suing AP for $150,000 over photo

But I thought Val wasn’t in it for the money?

Lawsuit over 9/11 photo heads to trial

April 12, 2007

BY SANDRA K. REABUCK
The Tribune-Democrat

The AP used the photo with a story about McClatchey and also put it on a downloadable database without her permission, McClatchey asserts. She is seeking at least $150,000 in damages, plus any profits AP realized.

And I wonder if the media made their checks out to the Todd Beamer Foundation for this...

Judge preserves lawsuit over Sept. 11 photo

Tuesday, April 03, 2007
By Milan Simonich, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Before her trouble with the AP, Mrs. McClatchey had licensed the use of her photo to various news organizations, including the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Newsweek and ABC. She generally charged $250 to $350 for one-time use of the picture, admitting she did not know how much freelance photographers commanded.

She is seeking $150,000 in damages, contending the AP was guilty of "willful infringement" of the copyright.

Read latest updates about her photo here.

Shanksville resident says Val's photo is fake!

See here

Youtube axed Val McClatchey interview

It’s been a popular week for my stuff getting axed:

Subject: Video Removed: Copyright Infringement
From: "DMCA Complaints"
To: "Killtown"
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007

Dear Member:

This is to notify you that we have removed or disabled access to the following material as a result of a third-party notification by Mussari-Loftus Associates, LTD claiming that this material is infringing:
Interview of "Flight 93 smoke plume" photographer [edited]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jliIl-ssbG0
Please Note: Repeat incidents of copyright infringement will result in the deletion of your account and all videos uploaded to that account. In order to avoid future strikes against your account, please delete any videos to which you do not own the rights, and refrain from uploading additional videos that infringe on the copyrights of others. For more information about YouTube's copyright policy, please read the Copyright Tips guide.
If you elect to send us a counter notice, please go to our Help Center to access the instructions.
Please note that under Section 512(f) of the Copyright Act, any person who knowingly materially misrepresents that material or activity was removed or disabled by mistake or misidentification may be subject to liability.
Sincerely,
YouTube, Inc.

You can still download and also read the McClatchey interview here.

McClatchey ‘condensed’ interview up on YouTube

If you couldn’t get through the original long 29:00 min version of Mrs. Val McClatchey being interviewed by Windsor Park Stories, I made* a condensed version to fit on YouTube.

If you haven't watched this interview of Val telling the story behind her "infamous" Flight 93 plume photo, it is a must. The story and presentation in this interview adds so much evidence to my claims about her photo being a fraud**, including opportunity, motive and even association with the FBI.

(Full printed version here.)

Also, for those of you who believe that when someone keeps looking up and to the left with their eyes when trying to recall an event that they are being less than honest, notice her eye movement throughout the video.

PS – How fast do you think this video will be axed from YouTube?

(*Special thanks for "Sureshot" and one other person at the old LC forum who I embarrassing forgot who it was for converting the original video.

**Meaning that the plume in her photo had to have originate from a different location which proves the official story a fraud, or the photo itself is a fraud.)