July 23, 2008

Air vs. Skyscraper (video)

Credit to Jim Fetzer and Joe Keith for idea for this video.

See also:

July 22, 2008

'Terrorcell' on Vyzygoth tonight talking about Susan McElwain seeing UAV in Shanksville

Domenick DiMaggio (aka "Terrorcell") will be on Vyzygoth's Beyond the Grassy Knoll show tonight at 10:00-12:00 EST.

He will be discussing the smoking gun testimony of Shanksville resident Susan McElwain who witnessed a wing-less UAV flying over her minivan seconds before the alleged crash of Flight 93.

Full interview of Mrs. McElwain by Domenick DiMaggio:

Partial interview:

Susan McElwain: It was pure white, there wasn't any markings on it, there was no rivets. It was that close I would have seen them. It was so molded like it was all one piece... It was cylinder, it came back and this spoiler was across it.

Terrorcell: And there were no wings or...?

Susan: I did not see any wings.

Terrorcell: What do you think it was?

Susan: I can only go by what other people have said to me cuz at the time I thought it was a plane. But like that guy from California who mailed me a bunch of pictures and that guy from Bedford who sent me a bunch of pictures, they all said the same thing that it had to be a missile or an unmanned plane or something...

July 18, 2008

'New clues' in unsolved Jovin murder

New Clues in Yale Student Murder

Investigators Release Sketch of Man Seen Near Where Suzanne Jovin's Body Was Found

July 3, 2008 — ABC

Shortly after the murder was reported, a local woman came forward claiming to have seen a man run in front of her car just half a mile from where Jovin's body was found. She had been driving slowly enough to get a look at his face and give a description to police.

The witness described a white male of medium height in his 20s or 30s, athletically built with blond to dark hair and sharp, chiseled facial features. Prosecutor James Clark in New Haven State's Attorney's Office, who inherited the case in 2000 after the former prosecutor became a judge, said the witness told authorities the man "was running pretty fast," which made her suspicious.

However, a source with knowledge of the case said the witness's information was disregarded at the time because investigators and the media were focused on Jovin's thesis adviser, who is no longer considered a suspect. The source called the decision to focus on the adviser a "fatal flaw" in the investigation.

The team, however, was very hesitant to make the sketch public, Clark said, because "this picture is not a portrait of anybody." That is why the police are not calling the depicted male a person of interest or a suspect.

Investigators seek the 'someone' Jovin referenced in hour before stabbing

Published Wednesday, July 16, 2008 -- yaledailynews.com

In its second revelation to the public in two weeks, a team of investigators probing the 1998 slaying of Yale College senior Suzanne Jovin has announced that it is seeking the identity of an individual to whom Jovin had lent GRE study materials — a potentially critical line of inquiry that lead investigator John Mannion said previous investigators on the case neglected to explore.

A mysterious, nondescript "someone," whom Jovin mentioned in an e-mail she sent less than an hour before she was found stabbed in New Haven's East Rock neighborhood, is the target of the Jovin Investigation Team's latest lead. But Mannion said there is nothing at this point to indicate that this “someone” is connected with the murder.

See also:

July 16, 2008

Lawson uses 'deception, insidious innuendo, misdirection and lies' on eBay

(Update 07/17/08: Sale of deceptively titled Lawson video canceled and pulled off eBay store account. See bottom of page.)

Anthony Lawson is a 10% truther because he spends most of his time trying to debunk September Clues because, as he puts it, Sept Clues is full of "deception, insidious innuendo, misdirection and lies."

I've been challenging him on his Sept Clues debunk attempt claims at Pilots For Truth forum (you'll have to log in), but he still refuses to back up his work (doesn't seem too confident in his work, does he?).

Now someone is selling a video on UK eBay they entitle "September Clues - 9/11 Conspiracy DVD" that looks like is the original September Clues when viewing the top section of the webpage:

However, when you scroll down to the second have of this item for sale, you see that it's not the original September Clues, but in fact Anthony Lawson's debunk attempt video:


Exposing the deception, insidious innuendo, misdirection and lies in the “September Clues” series of videos, which many scholars and others have mistaken for the truth about some of the events that happened on that terrible day: September 11, 2001. Hopefully, this video will make them realise that they have been deliberately mislead. (By the author of "WTC7 - This is an Orange") Content: Where necessary, some of the shots in this video have been enlarged, slowed down, or have had indicators or stop motion techniques applied to them. No other visual manipulations or additions have been made.


Lawson's debunk attempt video is called September Clues - Busted!, not September Clues.

It looks like Lawson (or whoever posted this item) was deliberately trying to mislead people in thinking it is the original September Clues because the original is also up for sale on UK eBay:

So who is guilty of "deception, insidious innuendo, misdirection and lies" now Lawson?



Deceptively titled Lawson video at UK eBay canceled and pulled from its Conspiracy World DVDs store after being caught:

Original end time: 25-Jul-08 23:08:32 BST (9 days 4 hours)
Canceled: 16-Jul-08 23:58:20 BST

Hat tip: mason-free party.

July 11, 2008

Air vs. Skyscraper (gif)

(Video used was the ABC/ESPN version of the Evan Fairbanks shot. Download gif.)

See also:

July 10, 2008

Al Jazeera aired fake WTC 1 crash footage

This video was not faked by the 9/11 perps, but most likely by Al Jazeera or related for their own use in their promo.

Source video.

July 09, 2008

Et tu, Bermas?

On Tuesday's Alex Jones show, Jason Bermas was discussing details from the BBC's WTC 7 doku hit piece. Near the end (not recorded in the previous link), Bermas mentions that the BBC was promoting disinformation by showing a close-up clip of Nico Haupt wearing his "TV fakery" t-shirt (@ 57:06).

Bermas then proceeded to insult the idea that TV fakery was used on 9/11 to cover-up that no planes hit the WTC by calling it something like a ludicrous theory.

Ludicrous huh? Well better not tell Bermas that the military planned to use 'TV Fakery' since 1995 and the media had warned since 1999 about the military's use of it and how live TV broadcasts can be doctored.

And does Bermas really have any room to talk about certain theories being "ludicrous." How many times did he have to redo Loose Change again? And speaking of "ludicrous," what does he think hit the WTC? Watch the first 4 mins of Bermas' Loose Change I for a refresher course:

Bermas believes in the "Pod" theory; drone planes with a special "pod" fired a missile out of it into the Twin Towers a fraction of a second before impacted. I also believe he thinks these drones were outfitted with "special skin" and that's why the plane appears to "melt" into the facade without meeting any resistance.

The Pod theory has been criticized arguably as much as TV fakery by some in the truth movement and Bermas got so much flak about promoting the "pod" theory in Loose Change I, that he took it out of his 2nd edition.

I'm sure one reason Bermas thinks TV fakery is "ludicrous" is that he buys into the "thousands of witnesses" around the WTC saw the planes. Yet, I believe he still thinks no plane crashed into the Pentagon even though "hundreds of witnesses" near the Pentagon "saw it."

A while back I had asked Dylan Avery what he and Jason Bermas thought hit the WTC on the Mike Swenson show (@ 5:32) when they had him set to be the first caller to attack me. Dylan says he never answered my question because "there's much better things to do" (or something like that) and when I pressed him again his responses was "I don't know what hit the 2nd Tower."

Too bad Bermas has joined the haters club. I always thought he was pretty open-minded. Sad to see he's now towing the Alex Jones' "That's disinformation!" party line.

Hope you are getting paid well over there Jason.

July 08, 2008

BBC neglect key points in WTC 7 doku

In the BBC's The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 - The Third Tower documentary (watch here), they fail to mention a few key points that you have to wonder why a major network like the BBC would do so if they went through all the time, trouble, and money to do a "thorough" documentary on the conspiracy theories about the WTC 7's unusual collapse.

1) The BBC neglected to show the unusual implosion of the East Penthouse on top of the WTC 7 seconds before the rest of the building imploded even after truther Richard Gage mentions it in the documentary.

(The about video clips were not shown in the BBC's documentary.
Red circle below is the East Penthouse on top of the WTC 7.)

"The Penthouse dropped and then the entire perimeter of the main building begins and goes straight down in 6 1/2 seconds which is virtually free-fall speed." - Richard Gage

What are the odds a Penthouse on top of a skyscraper implodes seconds before the rest of the building does?

2) They neglected to find out (or mention if they knew) who was the alleged fire department commander who Larry Silverstein uttered his most infamous phrase to.

"I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." - Larry Silverstein

How odd is it that years after Larry's infamous "pull it" remark, we still don't know who this fire department commander who allegedly called him was?

NOTE: The BBC shows FDNY Fire Chief Daniel Nigro after mentioning Larry's infamous "pull it" comment which makes it seem like the BBC is implying that Chief Nigro was the one who allegedly called Larry on 9/11, however in an email response, Chief Nigro says it wasn't him.

See also:

July 07, 2008

WTC 7 vs. Controlled Demolition

(Link - Video)

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck...