BBC neglect key points in WTC 7 doku

In the BBC's The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 - The Third Tower documentary (watch here), they fail to mention a few key points that you have to wonder why a major network like the BBC would do so if they went through all the time, trouble, and money to do a "thorough" documentary on the conspiracy theories about the WTC 7's unusual collapse.

1) The BBC neglected to show the unusual implosion of the East Penthouse on top of the WTC 7 seconds before the rest of the building imploded even after truther Richard Gage mentions it in the documentary.

(The about video clips were not shown in the BBC's documentary.
Red circle below is the East Penthouse on top of the WTC 7.)

"The Penthouse dropped and then the entire perimeter of the main building begins and goes straight down in 6 1/2 seconds which is virtually free-fall speed." - Richard Gage

What are the odds a Penthouse on top of a skyscraper implodes seconds before the rest of the building does?


2) They neglected to find out (or mention if they knew) who was the alleged fire department commander who Larry Silverstein uttered his most infamous phrase to.

"I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." - Larry Silverstein

How odd is it that years after Larry's infamous "pull it" remark, we still don't know who this fire department commander who allegedly called him was?


NOTE: The BBC shows FDNY Fire Chief Daniel Nigro after mentioning Larry's infamous "pull it" comment which makes it seem like the BBC is implying that Chief Nigro was the one who allegedly called Larry on 9/11, however in an email response, Chief Nigro says it wasn't him.


See also:

• GZ Rescuer: ‘WTC 7 about to blow up’
• Silverstein's First Public "Pull It" Response
• Boycott Silverstein Properties!

WTC 7 vs. Controlled Demolition

(Link - Video)

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck and quacks like a duck...

WTC 7 collapse videos (New Page)

A few animated gifs from the different videos of the WTC 7 collapse:

http://killtown.911review.org/wtc7/videos.html

Rosie O'Donnell questions WTC 7 collapse

Hey, better late than never:

wtc 7

Posted by ro on March 15th at 4:38pm in in the news

at 5 30 pm
9 11 2001
wtc7 collapsed

for the third time in history
fire brought down a steel building
reducing it to rubble

hold on folks
here we go

• The fires in WTC 7 were not evenly distributed, so a perfect collapse was impossible.
• Silverstein said to the fire department commander “the smartest thing to do is pull it.”
• Firefighters withdrawing from the area stated the building was going to “blow up”.
• The roof of WTC 7 visibly crumbled and the building collapsed perfectly into its footprint.
• Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris.

[WTC 7] contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud, including Enron’s), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank’s Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions. [Online Journal]

The SEC has not quantified the number of active cases in which substantial files were destroyed [by the collapse of WTC 7]. Reuters news service and the Los Angeles Times published reports estimating them at 3,000 to 4,000. They include the agency’s major inquiry into the manner in which investment banks divvied up hot shares of initial public offerings during the high-tech boom. …”Ongoing investigations at the New York SEC will be dramatically affected because so much of their work is paper-intensive,” said Max Berger of New York’s Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann. “This is a disaster for these cases.” [New York Lawyer]

Citigroup says some information that the committee is seeking [about WorldCom] was destroyed in the Sept. 11 terror attack on the World Trade Center. Salomon had offices in 7 World Trade Center, one of the buildings that collapsed in the aftermath of the attack. The bank says that back-up tapes of corporate emails from September 1998 through December 2000 were stored at the building and destroyed in the attack. [TheStreet]

Inside [WTC 7 was] the US Secret Service’s largest field office with more than 200 employees. …”All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building,” according to US Secret Service Special Agent David Curran. [TechTV]

lets start here
ok…go slow
remember 2 breathe
use google

And check out her recommended sites:

other sites

the lies that led to war
ross the intern
911 scholars
fallen heroes fund
john mayer
the view
rosacea
kid's cards
huffington post
adoptuskids
barbra's blog
julia sweeney
foster care

See also:

• Was the WTC 7 pulled?

YouTube axes four of my WTC 7 videos

YouTube removes four of my WTC 7 videos because of complaints by CBS:

Dear Member:

This is to notify you that we have removed or disabled access to the following material as a result of a third-party notification by CBS Broadcasting, Inc claiming that this material is infringing:

WTC 7 imploding on 9/11 - CBS: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eO-UnwqhtMc

WTC 7 imploding on 9/11 - CBS K-EYE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMaCHzO1h1k

WTC 7 imploding - Dan Rather comments: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BcquyD_DcQ

WTC 7 - East Penthouse Imploding First - TNN: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4SejBwgbCw

GZ Rescuer: ‘WTC 7 about to blow up’

(Updated: 10/29/06)

In one of the most clear-cut examples so far that the WTC 7 was pulled comes from a video clip showing a couple of Ground Zero rescuers overheard talking about what is about to happen to the building.


In the first video, two faint explosions* are heard as a group of rescuers are seen walking away from the area (these two faint explosions sound just like these two loud explosions* in this video clip taken at Ground Zero on 9/11). The group of rescue workers in the first video are then heard saying this about the WTC 7 after hearing these two faint explosions:

(video @ :05)

Rescuer 1: "It's blowin' boy. Did you hear that?"

Rescuer 2: "Keep your eye on that building, it will be coming down soon."

The second clip shows a rescuer warning everybody to get back because:

(video @ :11)

Rescuer 3: "The building is about to blow up. Move it back!"

"We are walking back. There's a building about to blow up. There's flame and debris coming down."

After the WTC 7 collapses, a group of rescuers are standing around looking at it saying:

(video @ 2:42)

Rescuer 4: "It's gone man!"

Rescuer 5: "Seven came down?"

So what else could it mean by those obvious sounds of explosives going off and these rescuers then saying that the WTC 7 is “blowin” and was going to be “coming down soon” and is about to “blow up” while telling people to move away from the area other then the Seven was about to be brought down by a controlled demolition?

Also, listen to this account by a NYU medical student who was watching the WTC 7 before it collapsed:

(video @ 1:22)

Reporter: “I'm here with an emergency worker. He's a first year NYU medical student. He was down there; he was trying to help people. His name is Darryl.”

Darryl: "Yeah I was just standing there, ya know... we were watching the building [WTC 7] actually 'cuz it was on fire... the bottom floors of the building were on fire and... we heard this sound that sounded like a clap of thunder... turned around - we were shocked to see that the building was, ah well it looked like there was a shockwave ripping through the building and the windows all busted out... it was horrifying... about a second later the bottom floor caved out and the building followed after that... we saw the building crash down all the way to the ground... we were in shock." - 1010 WINS NYC News Radio (09/11/01)

So this med student most likely hears the explosions going off as heard in the above two videos, sees a shockwave ripple through the WTC 7, its windows bust out, then sees its bottom floor cave out followed by the rest of the building. Sounds like he described seeing a demolition of a building, not a building collapsing from "fire".

Let's review the evidence so far that the WTC 7 was pulled:

1) A group of Ground Zero rescuers are over-heard saying the WTC 7 is "blowin'" and will be coming down soon after hearing some explosions* going off which sound like the same expolsions* heard much louder in this video.

2) A Ground Zero rescuer is over-heard saying the WTC 7 is about to blow up while moving people out of the area.

3) A NYU med student was watching the WTC 7 on fire and here’s a clap of thunder, sees a shockwave rippling through the building, saw windows from it bust out, then sees the bottom floor cave out followed by the rest of the building.

4) The collapse of the WTC 7 fell like a classic implosion:

5) On the roof of the WTC 7, the east mechanical penthouse implodes first into the middle of the building before the main structure collapses:

6) The collapse emits a billowing cloud of dust which is one of the most identifiable characteristics of a successful demolition.

7) If the official theory is true, then the WTC 7 will have become the first large steel building to have ever collapsed because of an uncontrolled fire.

8) The owner of the building, Larry Silverstein, blurted out in a PBS documentary to “pull it” and then mentioned those he said that to made the decision to “pull” and then they all watched the building collapse.

9) A FEMA reports concluded that the specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence, further research, investigation, and analyses are needed, and that the collapse of the Seven had a small debris field as the facade was pulled downward, suggesting an internal failure and implosion which is concurred by the NIST.

10) Multiple Ground Zero rescuers being interviewed report being told the following about the WTC 7:

• around 3 p.m. it was going to collapse
• a collapse zone was made around the area
• waiting for it to come down

Possible motives for demolishing the WTC 7, evidence of a cover-up, and who could have done it:

1) There was a near black-out in the media of its suspicious collapse and the engineering community was stumped as to why it collapsed.

2) WTC 7 debris was removed without investigators having the chance to examine the wreckage at the scene to help determine the cause of failure.

3) A secret CIA office was in the WTC 7 that engaged in counterterrorist and counterintelligence operations.

4) The Securities and Exchange Commission in the WTC 7 lost more critical documents than any other financial institution at the WTC, including hundreds of cases of files in which one executive whose company was under investigation mentioned that they got a “lucky break” when their case files were destroyed in the Seven’s collapse.

5) Other offices in the WTC 7 were occupied by the Department of Defense, IRS, Mayor's Office of Emergency Mgmt, and the U.S. Secret Service.

6) WTC 7 owner Larry Silverstein, who leased the rest of the WTC six weeks before 9/11 for $3.2 billion and sued his insurers of his complex for $7.2 billion and who’s life was spared at the WTC on 9/11 because he had a doctor’s appointment, received $861 million for the Seven’s collapse in which debt owed on it was only $383 million.

7) Some alleged 9/11 hijackers and their associated had accounts at a foreign branch of Standard Chartered Bank who occupied a large part of the WTC 7.

8) Demolition experts Controlled Demolition, Inc., who holds the world record for the tallest structural steel building ever imploded, was hired to help “clean up” at Ground Zero and have said the word “pull” in demolition terms mean pull it down.

(*Explosions heard are either two back-to-back explosions, or an immediate echo of the first explosion.)

CDI: 'Pull It' Means 'Pull It Down'

For those who still question what Larry Silverstein meant when he said "pull it" when talking about the collapse of the WTC 7, Jeff from PumpItOut.com called demolition experts Controlled Demolition, Inc (CDI) and asked them what "pull it" means in demolition terms. This is what CDI told him:

Click here to listen to conversation

Female receptionist: Good afternoon, Loizeaux Company.
Jeff: Um, sorry, do I -- is this Controlled Demolitions?
CDI: Yes it is.
Jeff: Ok, I was wondering if there was someone I could talk to briefly -- just ask a question I had?
CDI: Well what kind of question?
Jeff: Well I just wanted to know what a term meant in demolition terms.
CDI: Ok, what type of term?
Jeff: Well, if you were in the demolition business and you said the, the term "pull it," I was wondering what exactly that would mean?
CDI: "Pull it"?
Jeff: Yeah.
CDI: Hmm? Hold on a minute.
Jeff: Thank you.
CDI: Sir?
Jeff: Yes?
CDI: "Pull it" is when they actually pull it down.
Jeff: Oh, well thank you very much for your time.
CDI: Ok.
Jeff: Bye.
CDI: Bye.

(Remember that Controlled Demolitions, Inc was hired to help with the clean up at ground zero.)

The definition of "pull down":

pull down - To demolish; destroy: pull down an old office building.

pull down 1. To pull down or break up so that reconstruction is impossible: demolish, destroy, dismantle, dynamite, knock down, level, pulverize, raze, tear down, wreck

Again, here's the WTC owner Larry Silverstein's comment about the collapse of the WTC 7:

"I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse."

The WTC 7 imploding (notice its penthouse on the top left collapses in half and disappears into the building first):

Reporter: "...that building number 7 was going to collapse.
That appears to be what has happened now."

Hats off to Jeff from PumpItOut.com for taking the initiative to call CDI and reaffirming from the demolition experts themselves what the true meaning of the phrase "pull it" means; demolish!

See also:

WTC 7: Silverstein said "pull it"

Silverstein's First Public "Pull It" Response

I just stumbled across the first real public response for Larry Silverstein's "pull it" remark. It comes from the U.S. State Department's Spreading Disinformation, I mean "Identifying Misinformation" website (paid for at taxpayers expense of course) posted on Sept. 16, 2005 that included in a rebuttal to, among others, a section about the WTC 7 from the new 9/11 conspiracy book, 9/11 Revealed...

"The book suggests that the 47-story World Trade Center 7 building, which also collapsed on September 11, was intentionally demolished, citing a comment by the property owner that he had decided to “pull it.” The property owner was referring to pulling a contingent of firefighters out of the building in order to save lives because it appeared unstable."

It State Dept's site posts a statement released by Silverstein Properties spokesperson, Mr. Dara McQuillan, on Sept. 9, 2005 that says the following:

"Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001, after burning for seven hours. There were no casualties, thanks to the heroism of the Fire Department and the work of Silverstein Properties employees who evacuated tenants from the building.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a thorough investigation of the collapse of all the World Trade Center buildings. The FEMA report concluded that the collapse of Seven World Trade Center was a direct result of fires triggered by debris from the collapse of WTC Tower 1.

In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.

Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building and at 5:20 p.m. the building collapsed. No lives were lost at Seven World Trade Center on September 11, 2001."

Then the USINFO site goes on to say...

"As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building."

Just what I thought, he gives the "pull out the firefighters" response! "It" referred to "the contingent of firefighters"??? Yeah right! If that was the case, Silverstein would have said "pull them out", not "pull it". No one misspeaks that bad. The word "it" clearly refers to the building (singular), not a "contingent of firefighters" (plural). How condescending that he would refer to a contingent of firefighters as "it".

Also, it's already been reported that the FDNY never sent any firefighter "contingency" inside the WTC 7 and this order was made at 11:30 am...

"With the collapse of both towers by 10:30 a.m., larger pieces of the twin towers had smashed parts of 7 World Trade and set whole clusters of floors ablaze. An hour later, the Fire Department was forced to abandon its last efforts to save the building as it burned like a giant torch.

Falling debris also caused major structural damage to the building, which soon began burning on multiple floors, said Francis X. Gribbon, a spokesman for the Fire Department. By 11:30 a.m., the fire commander in charge of that area, Assistant Chief Frank Fellini, ordered firefighters away from it for safety reasons." - New York Times (11/29/01)

and then FEMA reported that the FDNY never even attempted to fight the fires in the 7...

"In addition, the firefighters made the decision fairly early on not to attempt to fight the fires, due in part to the damage to WTC 7 from the collapsing towers. Hence, the fire progressed throughout the day fairly unimpeded by automatic or manual suppression activities.

It appears that the sprinklers may not have been effective due to the limited water on site and that the development of the fires was not significantly impeded by the firefighters because manual firefighting efforts were stopped fairly early in the day.

WTC 7 collapsed approximately 7 hours after the collapse of WTC 1. Preliminary indications were that, due to lack of water, no manual firefighting actions were taken by FDNY." - FEMA (05/02)

So there is a conflict of facts here with the Silverstein spokesperson saying the Fire Commander called in the "afternoon" to say firefighters were attempting to contain the fires in the building and the news and FEMA reports saying the firefighters never attempted to put of the fires and had already been called back in the late morning and not "later in the day" as the spokesperson claims.


(See also Silverstein Properties Boycott.)

Boycott Silverstein Properties!

(Updated on: 12/04/05)

In light of the Larry Silverstein's first public "pull it" response that was issued by his company on September 9, 2005 to the U.S. State Dept's Identifying Misinformation website, their public statement has answered some, but not all of the Silverstein Boycott questions:

1. What did Larry Silverstein mean by the phrase "pull it" when talking to the fire department commander about the WTC 7 on the PBS documentary, "America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero"?

Silverstein Properties: "In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.
Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building..."

U.S. State Dept: "As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building.


2. Who was the fire department commander he was speaking to and what time did this call take place?

(Still unanswered.)

3. Who made the decision to "pull" after his recommendation to the fire department commander to "pull it"?

Silverstein Properties statement: "Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building..."

4. What time was the decision to "pull" made?

(The time of this decision to "pull" is still unknown. The released statement mentions the Fire Commander ordered the firefighters out of the building "later in the day" after Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Commander "in the afternoon". The WTC 7 collapsed at 5:20 p.m.)

As soon as the public receives an answer to the rest of these questions, the boycott will be rescinded.

Contact Silverstein Properties and urge them to answer the remaining questions and tell them that you will support a boycott against their company until he does.

Email Silverstein Properties at: info@silvprop.com

Or call them at 212.490.0666. That's 212.490.0666

World Trade Center homepage

INFORMATION/PRESS
Dara McQuillian
Communications Director
Silverstein Properties
530 5th Avenue
NY, NY 10036
212-302-6847
E-mail DMcQuillan@silvprop.com

---

Recap about Silverstein and the WTC 7 collapse

Larry Silverstein is the owner of the WTC and president of his real estate firm, Silverstein Properties. He owned the WTC 7 since 1987 and purchased the rest of the WTC complex only six weeks before the attacks:

"A private developer little known to the general public, Silverstein signed a 99-year lease for the twin towers just six weeks before the attack... His lease with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey remains in place, making Silverstein, 72, a key figure in the rebuilding of the site." - CBS Interactive

He has profited around $478 million from the WTC 7 collapsing:

"Industrial Risk Insurers is set to pay around $861 million to Silverstein for the lost building, which the company has owned since the 1980's, long before it acquired the master lease on the WTC. The debt on the property is around $383 million, much of it securitized as mortgage bonds." - Insurance Journal (06/07/02)

He has also profited of over a billion dollars (yes, billion!) when he won a court decision that said the attacks on his complex counted as two attacks instead of one in which his insurers were ordered to pay double the amount of his claim:

"The World Trade Center leaseholder has won a court victory over his insurers as he attempts to rebuild the site... A New York jury has decided that the 11 September 2001 attack on the two towers constituted two separate events... The US District Court ruling means Larry Silverstein could now get an extra $1.1bn from nine insurers to finance reconstruction... He has been fighting the insurance companies, arguing he was owed $7bn - double his $3.5bn policy." - BBC (12/07/04)

Controversy erupted in 2002 when Silverstein was interviewed on a PBS documentary, America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero, and seems to be saying that he recommended to "pull" the WTC 7, then they all watched the building collapse after the decision to "pull" was made:

Silverstein: "I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." (See video)

This admission is highly crucial because no plane crashed into it WTC 7, a 47-story skyscraper, and it was not right next to the collapsing WTC 1 or 2:

yet it mysteriously collapsed at 5:20 pm that evening with no immediate explanation as to why. By viewing videos of the 7 collapsing, it collapses in a manner that looks like it was brought down by a controlled demolition:

"For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down." - Dan Rather, CBS News (09/11/01) (hear audio)

The most revealing part of his admission is the word "pull" which is demolition lingo for "demolish" and to illustrate this, the term "pull" was used again in the same PBS video to describe the demolition of the WTC 6:

Construction worker: "Hello? Oh, we're getting ready to pull building six."

Luis Mendes, NYC official: "We had to be very careful how we demolished building six. We were worried about the building six coming down and then damaging the story walls, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area." (See video)

Another crucial piece of evidence of a controlled demolition came when four WTC rescuers, who were interviewed by the WTC Task Force, reported that they were "waiting around" for WTC 7 to collapse and one rescuers even says he was told around 3 pm that the 7 was going to collapse:

FIREFIGHTER SCOTT HOLOWACH, Interviewed 10/18/01

"We ended up back up on Vesey Street and West Street and just hanging out until tower 7 came down. After tower 7 came down, we went right to work over at tower 7 to put the fires out." - New York Times

PARAMEDIC STEVEN PILLA, Interviewed 10/17/01

"Then it was about 5:00, because I was getting hungry... We didn't do any further because building number seven was coming down. That was another problem, to wait for building seven to come down, because that was unsecure. It was about 5:30 that building came down." - New York Times

LIEUTENANT WILLIAM RYAN, Interviewed 10/18/01

"At that time he said, "7 has got fire on several floors." Then we found out, I guess around 3:00 o'clock, that they thought 7 was going to collapse... So it took us a while and we ended up backing everybody out, and that's when 7 collapsed... Basically, we fell back for 7 to collapse..." - New York Times

FIREFIGHTER FRANK SWEENEY, Interviewed 10/18/01

"Once they got us back together and organized somewhat, they sent us back down to Vesey, where we stood and waited for Seven World Trade Center to come down." - New York Times

Upon collapsing, the WTC 7 imploded and neatly fell on it's own footprint, consistent with a controlled demolition:

"The debris generated by the collapse of WTC 7... The average debris field radius was approximately 70 feet... The collapse of WTC 7 had a small debris field as the facade was pulled downward, suggesting an internal failure and implosion." - FEMA (05/02)

"...when you need to bring down a massive structure, say a... skyscraper, you have to haul out the big guns. Explosive demolition is the preferred method for safely and efficiently demolishing larger structures. When a building is surrounded by other buildings, it may be necessary to "implode" the building, that is, make it collapse down into its footprint." - HowStuffWorks.com

Also, there was a near total black-out of media coverage on it's incredible and highly unusual collapse, consistent with a cover-up:

"Almost lost in the chaos of the collapse of the World Trade Center is a mystery that under normal circumstances would probably have captured the attention of the city and the world. That mystery is the collapse of a nearby 47-story...Building 7 didn't get much attention in the media." - New York Times (11/29/01)

Two months after the attacks, the official theory on what caused the WTC 7 to mysteriously collapse was a "fire," which would have made it the first high-rise building in history to collapse from a fire:

"7 World Trade Center, had suffered mightily from the fire, and had been wounded by beams falling off the towers. But experts said no building like it, a modern, steel-reinforced high-rise, had ever collapsed because of an uncontrolled fire." - Chicago Tribune (11/09/01)

However, the U.S. government's own investigation into the collapse couldn't conclusively prove the "fire" theory:

"The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue." - FEMA (05/02)

(For more info about the WTC 7 collapse, see: Was the WTC 7 pulled?)