(Updated: 04/10/08)
I just saw a video today that is still pushing the "laser light" theory that has been a longtime claim by Lord Podder Phil Jayhan, so I thought I would put this myth to rest just like I put to rest the myth about Jayhan's beloved Pod.
The "laser light" is nothing more than a piece of paper floating around in the air.
Update:
I just saw a video today that is still pushing the "laser light" theory that has been a longtime claim by Lord Podder Phil Jayhan, so I thought I would put this myth to rest just like I put to rest the myth about Jayhan's beloved Pod.
The "laser light" is nothing more than a piece of paper floating around in the air.
Update:
I've included additional footage that shows tons of paper from the WTC floating and raining down on the filmer.
12 comments:
I'm not saying that thing is a laser-- I don't think it is-- but it isn't paper! It's WAY TOO BIG! It's more like a huge bedsheet floating down.
Thanks for linking to my video.
spooked is right. It is way too big for paper, plus the light quality is a pure light and much different from the refraction of tiny pieces of paper that are really FLOATING around. The tracking is a constant and is turned off just as it gets to the middle of the neighboring building. If this were paper, at least one if not all of the dozens of cameras aimed at this event would have picked it up. No, Jennifer Spell's camera was the ONLY one that picked it up.
FL911
Rent the DVD "7 Days in Sept" and watch real close. It's a piece of paper. The DVD also shows at the end of the Spell video, papers from the WTC are raining down at the very spot her video was taken.
That paper seen floating in the air was closer to her than the WTC, that's why you only see it in the Spell video, that's why you see it against the sky before the crash, it continues to be seen after the crash on the other building, and why it "blinks" because it's a piece of paper tumbling in the air, not a laser light guiding some CGI plane.
I know I know, I've seen it...paper before and paper after. This isn't paper. Thanks to your video I now have the angle of the laser projection from the source. You made me look at it harder and I found even more signs of this laser. Even you pointing out the light going through the building for me. AMAZING! I didn't know this "all weather" type of laser was in use already in 2001. Thanks a million for your help!
FL911
CORRECTION!!
I'm such a dork. After looking through your picture files I discovered that the position of that tower with the green top is NOT "behind" the South Tower. The "dot" you highlight in red at the end of your video is a REFLECTION! LOL
Great find by the way. I never even noticed that.
FL911
Killtown:"not a laser light guiding some CGI plane"
CGI plane? that thing is a real as the pimple on my nose! (old man acne)
I'm not saying that thing is a laser, but it still is too big for a piece of standard paper.
This one oughta get your goat!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr4BJ89Df5Q
LOL! FL911
spooked it's paper. The smoke is traveling right over where the Spell video was taken, so the heat is moving all the paper in that direction. The piece of paper that looks like it's reflecting off the surface of the South Tower most likely closer to the Spell location than the WTC.
And FL911, you are either really ignorant, or a shill. It's paper. The paper seen in the lower right-hand corner is seen on the east side of that neighboring building before it travels to where you mark it.
FL911=shill.
I'm still not convinced it is normal paper-- the trajectory seems wrong for it being much closer to Spell to make it that big.
Why are we taking Spell's word for anything anyway, if she takes credit for fake video?
Here is a wide screen 5x higher res version for you all!
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4650204243222697402
You are making me address the "paper" issue. Thanks for forcing my hand. It is the easiest "theory" about the dot to disprove. You know it is BS, but I will put together enough footage to call your bluff!
Post a Comment