I slowed the Courtesy CNN and CNN Exclusive fake 2nd hit videos down to 1fps using VirtualDub to, again, try to show the Podders that their beloved "pod" is not some special mechanical add-on on some one-off drone 767 that is used to fire out a missile from it a fraction of a second before it hits the South WTC Tower, but that it is just a result of sloppy animation of fake planes in fake videos. When doing this, I discovered what explains the appearance of a "pod" underneath the planes along with the disappearing wings & tails as the cartoon plane is about to melt through the cartoon building.
When the planes in the videos come into view against the blue sky background, there are no pods or other visible anomalies seen on the planes. ALL the observed anomalies happened when the cartoon planes pass in front of the black smoke coming out of the North Tower which suggests it's a result of animation blunders with the inserted CGI planes (or however they did it) when they pass in front of a different color from being moved across the blue sky (think blue screen in a sense). You can see that a "pod" immediately forms under the plane and gets more pronounced as the cartoon plane gets closer to the cartoon South Tower as if it is growing. Also notice that the planes stagger awkwardly across the screen.
Even though your theory that the "pod" underneath is a mechanical add-on is now debunked, there is still a "pod" underneath the plane that shouldn't be there, it's just not made out of aluminum, but pixels!
(SIDE NOTE: I also believe the Courtesy CNN video was aired before the CNN Exclusive because you’ll notice what crappy quality the Courtesy CNN video is compared to Exclusive CNN’s crisp and obvious computer enhanced colors.)
Dave vonKleist of 911 In Plane Site isn't purposely covering-up that this plane isn't showing a "pod" underneath when it's in front of blue sky to try to save his pod theory is he?
(See 38:25 into 911 In Plane Site to see this clip.)
And no, I'm not suggesting Dave vonKleist is a shill, but I just couldn't help notice that he is inadvertently(?) covering-up the underbelly of the CGI more... plane that does not show the "pod" when this "plane" is in front of the blue screen, er sky.