Just read a description of the video on another site. Sounds good, I'll watch it when I have time. Reminds me of something I was wondering about though: has anyone produced transcripts of the news coverage on 9/11 and/or tables/timelines with what the different news stations were showing at different times? This might yield some interesting clues (especially if we're arguing for media complicity).
They figured about the structual damage because it was so obvious.
I bet whoever made this video uses quotes of people on that morning saying they heard 'explosions' and they've never done tests for that. So there is nothing to prove it, and never will be.
Also he only changed the subject because the image everyone was looking at changed. Are you saying this guy, and the guy on the street and whoever else are in on 9/11 too?
3 comments:
Just read a description of the video on another site. Sounds good, I'll watch it when I have time. Reminds me of something I was wondering about though: has anyone produced transcripts of the news coverage on 9/11 and/or tables/timelines with what the different news stations were showing at different times? This might yield some interesting clues (especially if we're arguing for media complicity).
They figured about the structual damage because it was so obvious.
I bet whoever made this video uses quotes of people on that morning saying they heard 'explosions' and they've never done tests for that.
So there is nothing to prove it, and never will be.
Also he only changed the subject because the image everyone was looking at changed.
Are you saying this guy, and the guy on the street and whoever else are in on 9/11 too?
Post a Comment