November 16, 2005

Where The Pentagon Was Hit

Is this why the Pentagon was hit where it was hit?

Regardless as to whether you think a Boeing hit the Pentagon or not, if you think the Pentagon hit was an inside job, logic would dictate that there would have to be a motive for the elements in the US government to go through all the trouble and risk to want to attack it's own defense headquarters.

There are plenty of motives I can see as to why the government perps would want to hit the Pentagon on 9/11, but one motive stands out more than the rest in my opinion.

Now it's a dead giveaway that the Pentagon was hit on purpose from the "lucky" spot it was hit:

"Luck -- if it can be called that -- had it that the terrorists aimed the Boeing 757 at the only part of the Pentagon that already had been renovated in an 11-year, $1.3 billion project meant to bolster it against attack. That significantly limited the damage and loss of life by slowing the plane as it tore through the building and reducing the explosion's reach." - USA Today (1/01/02)

"...the plane struck the building almost in the middle of the space where the renovation had been completed. Personnel had not completely reoccupied this area of the building.
"This contributed to the relatively low number of casualties," Schwartz said. "The number could have been far greater had the plane struck another portion of the building not affected by the renovation." - Fort Meade/Army

But besides being hit in such a "lucky spot," this is the real reason why I think the Pentagon was hit where it was hit. It first starts with what Secretary of Defense Donald "and the missile to damage this building" Rumsfeld conveniently announced the day before the attacks that was sure to get buried amongst all the choas that was about to happen:

"On Sept. 10, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld declared war. Not on foreign terrorists, "the adversary's closer to home. It's the Pentagon bureaucracy," he said.
Rumsfeld promised change but the next day – Sept. 11-- the world changed and in the rush to fund the war on terrorism, the war on waste seems to have been forgotten.
Just last week President Bush announced, "my 2003 budget calls for more than $48 billion in new defense spending."
More money for the Pentagon, CBS News Correspondent Vince Gonzales reports, while its own auditors admit the military cannot account for 25 percent of what it spends.
"According to some estimates we cannot track $2.3 trillion in transactions," Rumsfeld admitted." -CBS (01/29/02)

Now guess what was located in the renovated section that was hit:

"The impact area included both the Navy operations center and the office complex of the National Guard and Army Reserve. It was also the end of the fiscal year and important budget information was in the damaged area." -Arlington County After-Action Report

So how convenient that the attacks came near the end of the fiscal year and that important budget information that may have shown a paper trail to some of that "lost" $2.3 trillion just got incinerated in the explosion from whatever hit there.

Now along with the paper trail that just got incinerated, check out what also was incinerated in that section:

"Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts. They were at their desks when American Airlines Flight 77 struck." - South Coast Today/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (12/20/01)

Now that's motive for elements in our government to attack the Pentagon if I ever saw one.


Oh, and who at the Pentagon was in charge of all the Pentagon's money? That's right, PNAC member Dov Zakheim, contributing author of the PNAC's "we need another Pearl Harbor" manifesto:



"Dov S. Zakheim was sworn in as the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) and Chief Financial Officer for the Department of Defense on May 4, 2001. Dr. Zakheim has previously served in a number of key positions in government and private business. Most recently, he was corporate vice president of System Planning Corp., a technology, research and analysis firm based in Arlington, Va. He also served as chief executive officer of SPC International Corp., a subsidiary specializing in political, military and economic consulting. During the 2000 presidential campaign, he served as a senior foreign policy advisor to then-Governor Bush.
Dr. Zakheim has been an adjunct professor at the National War College, Yeshiva University....
Dr. Zakheim has written, lectured and provided media commentary on national defense and foreign policy issues domestically and internationally. He is the author of "Flight of the Lavi: Inside a U.S.-Israeli Crisis"" - DoD
"To preserve American military preeminence in the coming decades, the Department of Defense must move more aggressively to experiment with new technologies and operational concepts, and seek to exploit the emerging revolution in military affairs.
Moreover, the Pentagon, constrained by limited budgets and pressing current missions, has seen funding for experimentation and transformation crowded out in recent years. Spending on military research and development has been reduced dramatically over the past decade.
Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.
PROJECT PARTICIPANTS
Dov Zakheim
System Planning Corporation" - "Rebuilding America's Defenses" - PNAC [Pages 50-51] (Sept. 2000)

and what does Zakheim's former company make?

- System Planning Corporation's Command Transmitter Systems (CTS) provide remote control and flight termination functions through a fully-redundant self-contained solid-state system.

- System Planning Corporation's is proud to offer the Flight Termination System (FTS), a fully redundant turnkey range safety and test system for remote control and flight termination of airborne test vehicles.

Also reported and rumored about Zakheim:

"He is an ordained Orthodox Jewish rabbi...as well as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations." - Wikipedia

"Zakheim, who is a dual Israeli/American citizen and a Shul Rabbi..." - judicial-inc

See more on the Pentagon crash here.

7 comments:

Analysis said...

Very nice post. Excellent research. I was pretty dismissive of claims that something other than Flight 77 hit the Pentagon until I read this as well as your examination of the passengers on board the plane on your other site. I definitely think you're onto something.

I have thought quite a bit about why 9/11 was carried out - basically I think it was a combined effort of the US and Israeli governments. The Bush family's interest, I suspect, probably relates to some deal with bin Laden relating to the restructuring of a lot of organized crime activity after the BCCI scandal in 1991. Probably bin Laden decided to cut Bush and other American criminals out of the loop on some profitable activities (opium production, money laundering, arms dealing, blood diamond smuggling, etc. - all areas bin Laden is known to have been involved in) and Bush wanted an excuse to go into Afghanistan and take bin Laden out.

The Israelis' interest was in the war in Iraq as well as the upcoming wars on Iran and Syria, and possibly other Middle Eastern countries. The Israelis are the ones who actually carried out the attacks for the most part - framing the Arabs and putting the explosives in the towers.

I do not have a website but I have elaborated on some of this (focusing mainly on the Israeli angle) in a brief article I've posted on several forums, you can read it here if you'd like.

Spooked said...

Great post. This puts a lot of important issues about the Pentahit together in one convenient package. Cool!

Anonymous said...

HI Killtown..

Throw in there another target for assassination.....the entire chain of command of the ultra secret Office of Naval Intelligence, who would have known to connect the dots that morning, was wiped out, and intended or not, a clear message was sent out to the military and the intelligence community of what could happen to them if they talked. As far as I know the only people in that segment was the budget people, ONI, and a few in public information. There was no jet fuel residue, and what fires burn in a circle? (Aerial photos).

malaprop

hellsbells said...

Hi,

Is it absolutely certain that the site of the initial strike at the pentagon is the same site that fell down 40 minutes later?

I've been watching 'Loose Change II' with a long helicopter flight showing the damage. The scorch marked wall near the helipad tower is clearly seen after the collapse, so they are not the same place.

Any thoughts about that?

1085720330 said...

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main

plug that in your address bar and play it. its nothing special. i saw it a while ago and when killtown mentioned the putting green it reminded me of this video. it just puts music and funny animations to what killtown said its good to hear more then one sorce are recovering the same data it means less of the info could be fabricated making killtown that much more credable to me anyways

i should register
1085720330

1085720330 said...

hey killtown i have something for ya that i think youll like i know what kind of plane the white mistery plane is that flew over the white house and the pentigon. your mistery plane is a vc-25A this plane is most nitoriusly known as airforce one. now the plane in the video is not airforce one however i have been spending hours pouring over aircraft books as well as the web and i finnaly found the only plane that matches that profile the vc-25A you should also know that strategic air comand uses this aircraft as well and do you know what color SAC paints their cv-25As??? you guessed it all white but it doesnt end there. In my research i found only three blue logos for planes, SAC, NATO(and NATO's is a circle that is sometimes seen on the front of the nose), and the 426th support battalion (how ever it is highly unlikly that the 426th uses the more refined interior of the vc-25A). wait theres more the c-130 that was also seen, was probably a AC-130 the A standing for attack the ac-130 and the c130 look exactly the same except for the fact that an ac-130 can carry a missle payload on its wings and its cargo hold is big enough to fit a tank or a small range uav

i have more info coming in but im not posting it at this time for varification purposes but i do NOT think that NATO should be ruled out but i will be sure on that the next time i post.

you have my skype info and my cell number call me if you need sorces pics or any other data to prove my statments

you know me
1085720330

1085720330 said...

for clarical purposes im reposting a few things like SAC paints their VC-25A white and i found three blue logos for planes [that deal with or work for the U.S.], SAC, NATO and the 426th

call me if you need sources, pics, or other data.

again
1085720330