March 30, 2007

The really really really strong wings of 'UA175'

and its indestructible tail section...


(Click image to activate gif. Download - Source)

(Click image to activate gif. Download - Source)

(Click image to activate gif. Download - Source)


(Click image to activate gif. Download - Source)

(Click image to activate gif. Download - Source)

(Click image to activate gif. Download - Source)


Its wings that are loaded with fuel don’t even explode and its tail section doesn't even get hacked off as they shredded those wimpy steel girders and floor slabs!


(Source)


Its wings are so strong that they can even cut through elevators in the middle of skyscrapers!


The bottom wing of United Flight 175 ripped through the south tower's 78th floor elevator lobby. – USA Today



Here’s how wimpy plane’s tail sections hold up during hard landings:




See also:

March 29, 2007

Perp Flight93crash.com down for the count?

(Update 03/30/01: After 2 weeks being down and only one day after this post, the spook site is back up!)


Back in Nov '06 I started raising questions about this site and called them out again in February that this site might be a perp site in the guise of a 9/11 conspiracy site specifically started about a week after 9/11 to distract our attention away from the fake crash site at Shanksville and make us believe that Flight 93, whether shot down or not, crashed in Shanksville:




Now I've never seen this website down before, but I noticed that for the last two weeks that when you click on their site, all that comes up is a blank screen:





Is it only temporary, or did we run these perps out of town!


.

March 28, 2007

TV Fakery explains the "Pod" phenomenon

(Updated: 06/20/07)

I slowed the Courtesy CNN and CNN Exclusive fake 2nd hit videos down to 1fps using VirtualDub to, again, try to show the Podders that their beloved "pod" is not some special mechanical add-on on some one-off drone 767 that is used to fire out a missile from it a fraction of a second before it hits the South WTC Tower, but that it is just a result of sloppy animation of fake planes in fake videos. When doing this, I discovered what explains the appearance of a "pod" underneath the planes along with the disappearing wings & tails as the cartoon plane is about to melt through the cartoon building.


When the planes in the videos come into view against the blue sky background, there are no pods or other visible anomalies seen on the planes. ALL the observed anomalies happened when the cartoon planes pass in front of the black smoke coming out of the North Tower which suggests it's a result of animation blunders with the inserted CGI planes (or however they did it) when they pass in front of a different color from being moved across the blue sky (think blue screen in a sense). You can see that a "pod" immediately forms under the plane and gets more pronounced as the cartoon plane gets closer to the cartoon South Tower as if it is growing. Also notice that the planes stagger awkwardly across the screen.






But don't fret Podders!


Even though your theory that the "pod" underneath is a mechanical add-on is now debunked, there is still a "pod" underneath the plane that shouldn't be there, it's just not made out of aluminum, but pixels!


(SIDE NOTE: I also believe the Courtesy CNN video was aired before the CNN Exclusive because you’ll notice what crappy quality the Courtesy CNN video is compared to Exclusive CNN’s crisp and obvious computer enhanced colors.)



(Updated) The vonKleist cover-up

Dave vonKleist of 911 In Plane Site isn't purposely covering-up that this plane isn't showing a "pod" underneath when it's in front of blue sky to try to save his pod theory is he?


(See 38:25 into 911 In Plane Site to see this clip.)


And no, I'm not suggesting Dave vonKleist is a shill, but I just couldn't help notice that he is inadvertently(?) covering-up the underbelly of the CGI plane that does not show the "pod" when this "plane" is in front of the blue screen, er sky.


See also:


March 27, 2007

Shanksville resident says Val's photo is fake!



See here




Perps trying to bust into my LC Forum account?

Last night I received four ‘password recovery’ notices from Loose Change Forum.



Someone with the following IP address (72.232.222.162) activated the recovery notices:




[Update]


I just got hit with about 50 password recovery notices from LCF all at once coming from this IP (67.159.5.55):





Boy, I sure must of made those 9/11 perps or JFUCKs mad!

March 26, 2007

44 People 'instantly cremated' on Flight UAL 93 - two Bibles Survive

Read the title again. It’s the title of this article which puts it a little more in perspective than if you just read the original article.

Out of the 44 passengers on board, we are told that only 8% of their total body mass were found in which I would agree that would fit the definition of “instantly cremated”.


See let’s think about that for a second, 44 people were instantly cremated when the 155ft long/100ton plane carrying them supposedly crashed, blew up, burned, and shredded into a million sharp little pieces in which this was all that was left:




yet bibles supposedly survived this well intact???


(Source)


When reading the title of the article in relationship to the official story, it seems really far fetched:


44 People 'instantly cremated' on Flight UAL 93

— two Bibles Survive


However, if the plane crash was faked and debris, including bibles, was planted, then the title of the article doesn’t seen far fetched at all, especially when you hear more stuff like this:


The second Bible was scrunched up and was lying open, he says, to the 121st Psalm, which is customarily read at funerals.


March 25, 2007

Someone is impersonating me with hate emails

If you received an email with stupid immature threats on it coming from my email address (killtown@yahoo.com), it wasn’t from me.


Some loser is using Flirga to send stupid threatening emails to 9/11 truthers with my email address attached to them to make them think they are coming from me in some pathetic attempt to try to discredit me.



A couple of them actually were sent to my inbox after they bounced from their intended target (that’s how I first found out), but some have unfortunately made it through to people.


So if you received a threatening email from my address along with some immature threats that looks like it was written by a teenager, it wasn’t from me.


The emails most likely are coming from the loser Randi kids over at JFUCK. Whoever is doing it, they are getting really desperate.


Here are some of the stupid immature threats on these emails:


Subject: Shill!

----------------

Subject: Loser

You ARE a loser, ****. Go and pimp your mum.

----------------

Subject: You Government Shill!

I used to believe you. Say Hallo to the cops, Shill.

----------------

Subject: Hello cointelpro expert

I will continue to expose your plane-hugging disinfo, Shill. You had your muddy, little disinfo show. Go pimp your mum instead.

----------------

Subject: NSA Shills in the 9/11 house

I revealed your dirty little secrets. You better stop or...

----------------

Subject: 9/11 and their spies

Women are bad for the movement. Especially if they work for the NSA.

You better watch out. Leave the movement. NOW!

----------------

Subject: Wake up, you Lunatic!

There is no room for so called researcher like you, spreading disinfo after disinfo. You never cared about 9/11 and your whole research is nothing but made up lies to divide people. These are your last days in our movenent,

----------------

Subject: Disinfo Agent

I will spread the message about you and your disinfo friends

Say good bye to the movement, Shill.

March 21, 2007

TV Fakery Test

(03/23/07: Answer to question below)


Look very closely at the following animated gifs:



(#482-83)

(#518-19)

(#519-20)

(#520-21)

(#549-50)

(#555-56)

(#561-62)





How do you think I
manipulated these videos?




(Answer below.)





Bonus:

(#312-13)

(#326-27)

(#362-63)

(#386-87)


Extra Bonuses:

(#147-48)

(#238-39)






Question: How do you think I manipulated these videos?







Answer: I didn't.



The bouncing effects you are seeing are what the video clips show when you loop two sequential frames from the videos together.





To replicate, get Vdownloader to grab videos (see links to videos under gifs). Then use VirtualDub to analyze video clips frame-by-frame. The numbers of the frames I used are listed under the gifs. Go back-and-forth between the frames to see the bouncing effect. Note that there are tons of these bouncing effects throughout the video clips.


The question is are these bouncing effects just the result of the normal compression phenomenon that do sometimes happen in videos taken with a camcorder, or are the amount and degree of these compression effects in all these 2nd hit videos abnormal?


March 18, 2007

'Why We Fight' - documentary about military industrial complex

Part 1/4


He may have been the ultimate icon of 1950s conformity and postwar complacency, but Dwight D. Eisenhower was an iconoclast, visionary, and the Cassandra of the New World Order. Upon departing his presidency, Eisenhower issued a stern, cogent warning about the burgeoning "military industrial complex," foretelling with ominous clarity the state of the world in 2004 with its incestuous entanglement of political, corporate, and Defense Department interests.

Link



Part 2/4


Part 3/4


Part 4/4




March 17, 2007

Rosie O'Donnell questions WTC 7 collapse


Hey, better late than never:

wtc 7

Posted by ro on March 15th at 4:38pm in in the news

at 5 30 pm
9 11 2001
wtc7 collapsed

for the third time in history
fire brought down a steel building
reducing it to rubble

hold on folks
here we go

• The fires in WTC 7 were not evenly distributed, so a perfect collapse was impossible.
• Silverstein said to the fire department commander “the smartest thing to do is pull it.”
• Firefighters withdrawing from the area stated the building was going to “blow up”.
• The roof of WTC 7 visibly crumbled and the building collapsed perfectly into its footprint.
• Molten steel and partially evaporated steel members were found in the debris.

[WTC 7] contained offices of the FBI, Department of Defense, IRS (which contained prodigious amounts of corporate tax fraud, including Enron’s), US Secret Service, Securities & Exchange Commission (with more stock fraud records), and Citibank’s Salomon Smith Barney, the Mayor’s Office of Emergency Management and many other financial institutions. [Online Journal]

The SEC has not quantified the number of active cases in which substantial files were destroyed [by the collapse of WTC 7]. Reuters news service and the Los Angeles Times published reports estimating them at 3,000 to 4,000. They include the agency’s major inquiry into the manner in which investment banks divvied up hot shares of initial public offerings during the high-tech boom. …”Ongoing investigations at the New York SEC will be dramatically affected because so much of their work is paper-intensive,” said Max Berger of New York’s Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann. “This is a disaster for these cases.” [New York Lawyer]

Citigroup says some information that the committee is seeking [about WorldCom] was destroyed in the Sept. 11 terror attack on the World Trade Center. Salomon had offices in 7 World Trade Center, one of the buildings that collapsed in the aftermath of the attack. The bank says that back-up tapes of corporate emails from September 1998 through December 2000 were stored at the building and destroyed in the attack. [TheStreet]

Inside [WTC 7 was] the US Secret Service’s largest field office with more than 200 employees. …”All the evidence that we stored at 7 World Trade, in all our cases, went down with the building,” according to US Secret Service Special Agent David Curran. [TechTV]

lets start here
ok…go slow
remember 2 breathe
use google



And check out her recommended sites:


other sites

the lies that led to war
ross the intern
911 scholars
fallen heroes fund
john mayer
the view
rosacea
kid's cards
huffington post
adoptuskids
barbra's blog
julia sweeney
foster care


See also:


March 09, 2007

Boycott YouTube!



After a flurry of recent axings of my work, YouTube axed my account today without any notification.


When you go to my old account there, it says:


This user account is suspended.”


However, when I log in it says:


Your account has now been permanently disabled.”



I had almost a 100 videos uploaded there. If any of my videos there were violating their rules, I would have gladly removed them.


Looks like a lot of people have been getting their accounts axed by YouTube. Just check out all the axed accounts of the people who subscribed to TheWebFairy’s and GoatPussy’s account:



So instead of getting mad, let’s get even!


YouTube is censoring and they’ve also sold out to CIA-linked Google, so let's show the government and these corporate pigs that we don’t support censorship by sticking it to them where it hurts and:


BOYCOTT YOUTUBE!


If you have a YouTube account with not too many videos uploaded, delete all your videos off of it and upload this short vid:




If you have a lot of videos uploaded there, just state you won’t be uploading to YouTube anymore and upload the YouTube boycott video as your last one.


Remember, Fight the Power!


March 06, 2007

UA93 : The Hijackers 9/11 Truth - by Terrorcell



Excellent new short film about the alleged hijackers of Flight 93 by my good friend Terrorcell.

After watching it, you’ll walk away realizing that if Flight 93 was hijacked, it wasn’t by the alleged four the FBI said it was.