And they just keep coming!
A very interesting new WTC 2 plane crash video was released yesterday. It's especially interesting because it is a rare frontal hit shot like the infamous Michael Hezarkhani video and shows a lot of, if not all of, the same characteristics the Hezarkhani shot such as the "pod" and the scary faces in the smoke:
The first odd thing about it right off the bat is that on the YouTube account is was released on, the video is on its left side:
This Youtube account, that is nick-named "shizzzham" (which I named this new video), has only three videos currently uploaded on it. The first two videos are just close-ups of an infant that looks like, or is trying to make it look like, "shizzzham's" child. These two videos are both exactly 45 seconds long and were uploaded on the same day, one week prior to the new crash video. However, this account was created over a year ago:
The comment "shizzzham" wrote for this new crash video is quite interesting:
Um, how in the world did this "shizzzham" manage get this never seen been, 6 years after the fact, incredible, amazing, one-in-a-billion chance dramatic shot of one of the worst "terrorist" attacks in the history of the world from someone he can't even remember the name of??? And who in the hell is this "new hire" who never shows this video to the world, yet gives it to some guy he doesn't even know at his new company? No, nothing odd there.
Here are some observations when analyzing this new video:
- The voices heard in the video do sound to be Japanese which this "shizzzham" says he's from, however the infant in the other two videos at this account doesn't really look Japanese and the infant's name is "Lucio."
- The video quality is poor (so what's new?!).
- The camera is mainly focused on the South Tower and not the North one which is on fire. I was going to mention this is odd, but perhaps maybe it isn't since most of the alleged filmers of these 2nd hit videos seem to know when and where to pan/zoom right before this second plane comes in the scene as if they rehearsed the shot over and over!
- The plane that comes in totally skips across the screen, which again seems to be a common theme in many of the 2nd hit videos.
- The Rector St building is visible. ; )
- Last, but definitely not least, this video is also one of the rare videos that actually captures bystanders in it. What's really interesting about the crowd of people shown is that they certainly do not seem to be reacting as if a huge plane just barreled loudly over their heads and crashed into not only a huge skyscraper behind them, but the one next to its mate that was already on fire!
Hat tip to PKiwiR.
A very interesting new WTC 2 plane crash video was released yesterday. It's especially interesting because it is a rare frontal hit shot like the infamous Michael Hezarkhani video and shows a lot of, if not all of, the same characteristics the Hezarkhani shot such as the "pod" and the scary faces in the smoke:
The first odd thing about it right off the bat is that on the YouTube account is was released on, the video is on its left side:
This Youtube account, that is nick-named "shizzzham" (which I named this new video), has only three videos currently uploaded on it. The first two videos are just close-ups of an infant that looks like, or is trying to make it look like, "shizzzham's" child. These two videos are both exactly 45 seconds long and were uploaded on the same day, one week prior to the new crash video. However, this account was created over a year ago:
shizzzham
Joined: July 22, 2006
Age: 37
Country: Japan
This YouTube account reminds me quite a bit as another YouTube account with a "family feel" that released an "amateur" 2nd hit video out of no where years after that attacks.
The comment "shizzzham" wrote for this new crash video is quite interesting:
A new hire from our company captured this while in NY for training. He was on the way to the office and saw one tower on fire and then started filming. In full view you can see the second plane smashing into the second tower. Amazing footage. I wish I remembered the man's name to give him the credit.
Um, how in the world did this "shizzzham" manage get this never seen been, 6 years after the fact, incredible, amazing, one-in-a-billion chance dramatic shot of one of the worst "terrorist" attacks in the history of the world from someone he can't even remember the name of??? And who in the hell is this "new hire" who never shows this video to the world, yet gives it to some guy he doesn't even know at his new company? No, nothing odd there.
Here are some observations when analyzing this new video:
- The voices heard in the video do sound to be Japanese which this "shizzzham" says he's from, however the infant in the other two videos at this account doesn't really look Japanese and the infant's name is "Lucio."
- The video quality is poor (so what's new?!).
- The camera is mainly focused on the South Tower and not the North one which is on fire. I was going to mention this is odd, but perhaps maybe it isn't since most of the alleged filmers of these 2nd hit videos seem to know when and where to pan/zoom right before this second plane comes in the scene as if they rehearsed the shot over and over!
- The plane that comes in totally skips across the screen, which again seems to be a common theme in many of the 2nd hit videos.
- The Rector St building is visible. ; )
- Last, but definitely not least, this video is also one of the rare videos that actually captures bystanders in it. What's really interesting about the crowd of people shown is that they certainly do not seem to be reacting as if a huge plane just barreled loudly over their heads and crashed into not only a huge skyscraper behind them, but the one next to its mate that was already on fire!
Hat tip to PKiwiR.
2 comments:
the guys sotry about an office aquaintence who took it an passed it along does not imply he passed it along just in the past year. It could be they want you to believe he gave it out years ago, didn't realize it's value or want o take advantage of that, and just gave it to someone?
It may be that such footage is not considered valuable to some people who assume the government is not lying?
Every time I watch a vid or view a a still, I find the point of impact blasts fireballs different. In most vids you see the 2nd plane hit explosion aa a violent fireball blast, this vid wasnt. I hope the truth will prevail.
Post a Comment