The Reagan Shooting Conspiracy

If I had to think back for the one goverment conspiracy theory that got me convinced that government conspiracies really do happen then this is it, the assassination attemp of President Ronald Reagan in the spring of 1981.

Reagan was the first U.S. President to be shot since JFK and if you were around back then, you probably remember where you were when you heard about it. The shooting was also caught on video and shown on TV over, and over, and over again.

So what was the government conspiracy about this shooting? I mean some young screw-ball nutcase shot the President -- along with a couple of other people who were in the way -- to try to satisfy his sick twisted fantasies of impressing the young Jodi Foster and afterwards was found guilty by reason of insanity and locked up in a mental hospital for the rest of his life where he belongs. Seemed like a case that was pretty open shut and end of story, right?

Well that's what I thought for so many years, until I found out something very interesting about John Hinckley Jr, the alleged shooter. Looks like Hinckley's family had some powerful friends in very high places. How high? Try the man who would have became President if Reagan had died; George Herbert Walker Bush...

And to further add to the incredible revealation that the shooter's family and the President's own Vice President were aquanted, a huge story like this should have been reported over and over again on every TV news station and plastered on the headlines of every newspaper in the country, but only a few newspapers that can be counted on one hand picked up the story and almost no mention on TV. A total media blackout that should have been the most talked about topic at the time, even more than the shooting itself.

Of course there is one more part of this conspiracy that's even more astounishing then the connection between Vice President Bush and the shooter and that is that John Hinckley Jr. did not shoot Reagan (yes, you read that correctly).

Click here for more about this conspiracy.

Why BushCo Hates Chavez

I've been wondering what's the big fuss over Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez lately and why the NeoCons hate him so much that some even have called for his assassination.

Well now I know why...

"Oil-producing nations have all the bargains. The country with the world's cheapest pump prices is Venezuela, where a gallon of gas goes for 12 cents." -Washington Post (08/28/05)

Silverstein's First Public "Pull It" Response

I just stumbled across the first real public response for Larry Silverstein's "pull it" remark. It comes from the U.S. State Department's Spreading Disinformation, I mean "Identifying Misinformation" website (paid for at taxpayers expense of course) posted on Sept. 16, 2005 that included in a rebuttal to, among others, a section about the WTC 7 from the new 9/11 conspiracy book, 9/11 Revealed...

"The book suggests that the 47-story World Trade Center 7 building, which also collapsed on September 11, was intentionally demolished, citing a comment by the property owner that he had decided to “pull it.” The property owner was referring to pulling a contingent of firefighters out of the building in order to save lives because it appeared unstable."

It State Dept's site posts a statement released by Silverstein Properties spokesperson, Mr. Dara McQuillan, on Sept. 9, 2005 that says the following:

"Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001, after burning for seven hours. There were no casualties, thanks to the heroism of the Fire Department and the work of Silverstein Properties employees who evacuated tenants from the building.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a thorough investigation of the collapse of all the World Trade Center buildings. The FEMA report concluded that the collapse of Seven World Trade Center was a direct result of fires triggered by debris from the collapse of WTC Tower 1.

In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.

Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building and at 5:20 p.m. the building collapsed. No lives were lost at Seven World Trade Center on September 11, 2001."

Then the USINFO site goes on to say...

"As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building."

Just what I thought, he gives the "pull out the firefighters" response! "It" referred to "the contingent of firefighters"??? Yeah right! If that was the case, Silverstein would have said "pull them out", not "pull it". No one misspeaks that bad. The word "it" clearly refers to the building (singular), not a "contingent of firefighters" (plural). How condescending that he would refer to a contingent of firefighters as "it".

Also, it's already been reported that the FDNY never sent any firefighter "contingency" inside the WTC 7 and this order was made at 11:30 am...

"With the collapse of both towers by 10:30 a.m., larger pieces of the twin towers had smashed parts of 7 World Trade and set whole clusters of floors ablaze. An hour later, the Fire Department was forced to abandon its last efforts to save the building as it burned like a giant torch.

Falling debris also caused major structural damage to the building, which soon began burning on multiple floors, said Francis X. Gribbon, a spokesman for the Fire Department. By 11:30 a.m., the fire commander in charge of that area, Assistant Chief Frank Fellini, ordered firefighters away from it for safety reasons." - New York Times (11/29/01)

and then FEMA reported that the FDNY never even attempted to fight the fires in the 7...

"In addition, the firefighters made the decision fairly early on not to attempt to fight the fires, due in part to the damage to WTC 7 from the collapsing towers. Hence, the fire progressed throughout the day fairly unimpeded by automatic or manual suppression activities.

It appears that the sprinklers may not have been effective due to the limited water on site and that the development of the fires was not significantly impeded by the firefighters because manual firefighting efforts were stopped fairly early in the day.

WTC 7 collapsed approximately 7 hours after the collapse of WTC 1. Preliminary indications were that, due to lack of water, no manual firefighting actions were taken by FDNY." - FEMA (05/02)

So there is a conflict of facts here with the Silverstein spokesperson saying the Fire Commander called in the "afternoon" to say firefighters were attempting to contain the fires in the building and the news and FEMA reports saying the firefighters never attempted to put of the fires and had already been called back in the late morning and not "later in the day" as the spokesperson claims.


(See also Silverstein Properties Boycott.)

Is Barbara Olson still alive?

Barbara Olson was supposedly a passenger on Flight 77 and of course died when it supposedly crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11. She was the 3rd wife of U.S. Solicitor General and BushCo member, Ted Olson. Mr. Olson claimed that Barbara had called him collect from her cellphone twice from Flight 77 after it was hijacked (yes, called him twice from her cellphone on the plane ... collect).

Many 9/11 truthers believe Ted Olson totally made up this story that she called him twice from the plane as part of the government's 9/11 conspiracy plot since, among other things, calling someone collect from a cellphone is absurd and that her alleged calls to him was the only source from all the alleged phone calls from any of the four hijacked planes that said the hijackers used "boxcutters". Of course it shouldn't come to anyone's surprise that Ted Olson would make this story up that his wife called him from the plane since Ted has admitting in public before that the government lies.

Many truthers believe that Barbara was either in on the conspiracy plot too and is still alive or that she was one of the many unlucky ones chosen that day to be a doomed passenger. For those who think she might still be alive, it has been rumored that she is alive and well in Europe. Well, maybe not too well after this one...

9-11 crash victim Barbara Olson arrested in Europe

Germany--September 22, 2005--TomFlocco.com--French and American intelligence agents have arrested Barbara Olson, the wife of a former Bush administration official, a few days ago on the Polish-German border, according to agents close to and with knowledge of the incident.

The alleged 9.11 Pentagon crash victim was found to be in possession of millions in fake interbank Italian lyra currency, according to the agents.

Olson was also reportedly in possession of a fraudulent Vatican passport and was held on charges of counterfeiting.

Now of course we need to take a sensational story like this with a grain of salt, a BIG grain of salt, but none the less it definitely has everybody who's following the 9/11 conspiracies on the edge of their seats just asking "what if?!" How will the U.S. government explain this one to the people if Barbara Olson was found ALIVE and well? A discovery like this would blow the top off the 9/11 conspiracy cover-up.

Some say though that Tom Flocco has lost all credibility by posting this story. Apparently Flocco made some errors on his first post of this story by spelling Barbara's last as "Olsen" (the correct spelling is "Olson") and it said she was arrested at the "Polish-Austrian" in which these two countries don't share borders.

Flocco has since corrected these two minor errors:

[We have changed the location of this report to the Polish-German border to correct the original phoned-in intelligence report we received. When we went back and questioned this location, We were given the Polish-German border as the correct location. The spelling of Olson’s name was corrected within 60 minutes after the story was posted. TF]

It's also mentioned in the article that Flocco reported Barbara was arrested with millions in fake interbank Italian lyra currency, but that the Italian lyra is no longer tenable currency.

I will agree that Flocco's reputation is definitely on the line by posting this story. He's going to have some explaining to do if this story doesn't pan out.

Of course I will be one of those many 9/11 skeptics that will be remaining at the edge of my seat to see if this story pans out or not!

You Can't Handle the Truth!

One of my favorite lines comes from one of my favorite movies, A Few Good Men, during a heated courtroom cross examination by Tom Cruise (Lt. Daniel Kaffee) to the great Jack Nicholson (Col. Nathan R. Jessep)...

Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I think I'm entitled to them.
Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I want the truth!
Jessep: You can't handle the truth!

You can't handle the truth. Wow. So powerful. So to the point.

I was reminded of this line when reading through a Village Voice article about the 9/11 inside job protests at ground zero this past Sunday. It contained a quote from a 9/11 victim's family member about their thoughts of 9/11 being a conspiracy. I've omitted the person's last name, because I'm not bringing up what they said to try to embarrass them, but rather to illustrate my point...

9-11 Conspiracists Invade Ground Zero

"It seemed most family members did their best to ignore the speakout. "That's what this country is about, that people can say what they want even if I don't agree with it," said Rudy..., whose brother William died in the North Tower, leaving behind a wife and two kids. "To have more fingerpointing and Congressional hearings, where does that get us? I can't live with myself to think that that was a conspiracy," he said, clearly pained at the thought of even having to address such a question." -Village Voice (09/12/05)

This person's comment exemplifies why I think people don't believe in government conspiracies. It's not that they don't believe they happen, they don't want to believe they happen. They can't handle the truth.

I'm mean you really can't blame this poor guy for not wanting to think that factions in his own government might have been the one's who were really behind the murder of his brother and almost 3,000 others in his country when all this time his government has been telling him that it was some evil group of foreign terrorists who were responsible. It's like if your parents were murdered in their home and one of your siblings, who was living with them, told you that it was some intruder who broke in in the middle of the night who killed them and you lived for years with the belief that the culprit was some low-life scumbag that you didn't know, but then later after re-examining the case, all the evidence points that it was your own sibling who really did it.

For not wanting to even think about questioning his own government on this, this person will never find out who really murdered his brother and if no one else questions things, the real culprits will likely remain free to kill again.

Yes, the truth can be quite painful. It can make us choose to live the comfortable lie instead. It can make us live in denial, but at what point does a country suffer when most of it's citizens live in denial? I can think of a dozen brutal dictators in the last half century that were glad their citizens choose to live in denial rather than wake up to the cold hard realities of what was going on at the time before these dictators rose to power.

When it comes to questioning potential government corruption and/or complicity in a crime, such as with 9/11, the people shouldn't fear the truth. They should fear not getting at the truth.

So let me end by giving you one of my other favorite lines...

"The truth shall set you free!"

Boycott Silverstein Properties!

(Updated on: 12/04/05)

In light of the Larry Silverstein's first public "pull it" response that was issued by his company on September 9, 2005 to the U.S. State Dept's Identifying Misinformation website, their public statement has answered some, but not all of the Silverstein Boycott questions:

1. What did Larry Silverstein mean by the phrase "pull it" when talking to the fire department commander about the WTC 7 on the PBS documentary, "America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero"?

Silverstein Properties: "In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building.
Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building..."

U.S. State Dept: "As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building.


2. Who was the fire department commander he was speaking to and what time did this call take place?

(Still unanswered.)

3. Who made the decision to "pull" after his recommendation to the fire department commander to "pull it"?

Silverstein Properties statement: "Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building..."

4. What time was the decision to "pull" made?

(The time of this decision to "pull" is still unknown. The released statement mentions the Fire Commander ordered the firefighters out of the building "later in the day" after Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Commander "in the afternoon". The WTC 7 collapsed at 5:20 p.m.)

As soon as the public receives an answer to the rest of these questions, the boycott will be rescinded.

Contact Silverstein Properties and urge them to answer the remaining questions and tell them that you will support a boycott against their company until he does.

Email Silverstein Properties at: info@silvprop.com

Or call them at 212.490.0666. That's 212.490.0666

World Trade Center homepage

INFORMATION/PRESS
Dara McQuillian
Communications Director
Silverstein Properties
530 5th Avenue
NY, NY 10036
212-302-6847
E-mail DMcQuillan@silvprop.com

---

Recap about Silverstein and the WTC 7 collapse

Larry Silverstein is the owner of the WTC and president of his real estate firm, Silverstein Properties. He owned the WTC 7 since 1987 and purchased the rest of the WTC complex only six weeks before the attacks:

"A private developer little known to the general public, Silverstein signed a 99-year lease for the twin towers just six weeks before the attack... His lease with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey remains in place, making Silverstein, 72, a key figure in the rebuilding of the site." - CBS Interactive

He has profited around $478 million from the WTC 7 collapsing:

"Industrial Risk Insurers is set to pay around $861 million to Silverstein for the lost building, which the company has owned since the 1980's, long before it acquired the master lease on the WTC. The debt on the property is around $383 million, much of it securitized as mortgage bonds." - Insurance Journal (06/07/02)

He has also profited of over a billion dollars (yes, billion!) when he won a court decision that said the attacks on his complex counted as two attacks instead of one in which his insurers were ordered to pay double the amount of his claim:

"The World Trade Center leaseholder has won a court victory over his insurers as he attempts to rebuild the site... A New York jury has decided that the 11 September 2001 attack on the two towers constituted two separate events... The US District Court ruling means Larry Silverstein could now get an extra $1.1bn from nine insurers to finance reconstruction... He has been fighting the insurance companies, arguing he was owed $7bn - double his $3.5bn policy." - BBC (12/07/04)

Controversy erupted in 2002 when Silverstein was interviewed on a PBS documentary, America Rebuilds: A Year at Ground Zero, and seems to be saying that he recommended to "pull" the WTC 7, then they all watched the building collapse after the decision to "pull" was made:

Silverstein: "I remember getting a call from the, uh, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, 'You know we've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is, is pull it.' Uh, and they made that decision to pull and then we watched the building collapse." (See video)

This admission is highly crucial because no plane crashed into it WTC 7, a 47-story skyscraper, and it was not right next to the collapsing WTC 1 or 2:

yet it mysteriously collapsed at 5:20 pm that evening with no immediate explanation as to why. By viewing videos of the 7 collapsing, it collapses in a manner that looks like it was brought down by a controlled demolition:

"For the third time today, it's reminiscent of those pictures we've all seen too much on television before when a building was deliberately destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down." - Dan Rather, CBS News (09/11/01) (hear audio)

The most revealing part of his admission is the word "pull" which is demolition lingo for "demolish" and to illustrate this, the term "pull" was used again in the same PBS video to describe the demolition of the WTC 6:

Construction worker: "Hello? Oh, we're getting ready to pull building six."

Luis Mendes, NYC official: "We had to be very careful how we demolished building six. We were worried about the building six coming down and then damaging the story walls, so we wanted that particular building to fall within a certain area." (See video)

Another crucial piece of evidence of a controlled demolition came when four WTC rescuers, who were interviewed by the WTC Task Force, reported that they were "waiting around" for WTC 7 to collapse and one rescuers even says he was told around 3 pm that the 7 was going to collapse:

FIREFIGHTER SCOTT HOLOWACH, Interviewed 10/18/01

"We ended up back up on Vesey Street and West Street and just hanging out until tower 7 came down. After tower 7 came down, we went right to work over at tower 7 to put the fires out." - New York Times

PARAMEDIC STEVEN PILLA, Interviewed 10/17/01

"Then it was about 5:00, because I was getting hungry... We didn't do any further because building number seven was coming down. That was another problem, to wait for building seven to come down, because that was unsecure. It was about 5:30 that building came down." - New York Times

LIEUTENANT WILLIAM RYAN, Interviewed 10/18/01

"At that time he said, "7 has got fire on several floors." Then we found out, I guess around 3:00 o'clock, that they thought 7 was going to collapse... So it took us a while and we ended up backing everybody out, and that's when 7 collapsed... Basically, we fell back for 7 to collapse..." - New York Times

FIREFIGHTER FRANK SWEENEY, Interviewed 10/18/01

"Once they got us back together and organized somewhat, they sent us back down to Vesey, where we stood and waited for Seven World Trade Center to come down." - New York Times

Upon collapsing, the WTC 7 imploded and neatly fell on it's own footprint, consistent with a controlled demolition:

"The debris generated by the collapse of WTC 7... The average debris field radius was approximately 70 feet... The collapse of WTC 7 had a small debris field as the facade was pulled downward, suggesting an internal failure and implosion." - FEMA (05/02)

"...when you need to bring down a massive structure, say a... skyscraper, you have to haul out the big guns. Explosive demolition is the preferred method for safely and efficiently demolishing larger structures. When a building is surrounded by other buildings, it may be necessary to "implode" the building, that is, make it collapse down into its footprint." - HowStuffWorks.com

Also, there was a near total black-out of media coverage on it's incredible and highly unusual collapse, consistent with a cover-up:

"Almost lost in the chaos of the collapse of the World Trade Center is a mystery that under normal circumstances would probably have captured the attention of the city and the world. That mystery is the collapse of a nearby 47-story...Building 7 didn't get much attention in the media." - New York Times (11/29/01)

Two months after the attacks, the official theory on what caused the WTC 7 to mysteriously collapse was a "fire," which would have made it the first high-rise building in history to collapse from a fire:

"7 World Trade Center, had suffered mightily from the fire, and had been wounded by beams falling off the towers. But experts said no building like it, a modern, steel-reinforced high-rise, had ever collapsed because of an uncontrolled fire." - Chicago Tribune (11/09/01)

However, the U.S. government's own investigation into the collapse couldn't conclusively prove the "fire" theory:

"The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue." - FEMA (05/02)

(For more info about the WTC 7 collapse, see: Was the WTC 7 pulled?)

Assassination 101

If you ever wonder why I call my website "Killtown," now you'll know. Here is a manual written by our good ol' CIA titled "A Study of Assassination" posted at the NSA (no not them, the National Security Archives). It was distributed to operatives to help train them for "Operation PBSUCCESS," a successful U.S. backed coup against the democratically elected Guatemalan President in 1954.

After this coup, a lengthy rule of various brutal U.S. backed military dictators left hundreds of thousands of Guatemalans dead from counterinsurgency campaigns. So after the U.S. backed coup of 1954, Guatemala became a "Killtown".

So on that bright note, lets jump in and see what it takes to be a government sponsored hitman (or woman). When I read through this, I couldn't help but think of one of my favorite wet boys, Mitch "Booth" Leary. It really helped me get into the spirit of things.

Oh by the way, this study is pretty long (they sure don't miss any opportune method to whack you!), so we're just going to skim through it. I do recommend you read the whole study though. To really get the full effect.

A STUDY OF ASSASSINATION

DEFINITION

Assassination is a term thought to be derived from "Hashish", a drug similar to marijuana, said to have been used by Hasan-Dan-Sabah to induce motivation in his followers, who were assigned to carry out political and other murders, usually at the cost of their lives.

Yeah, smoke up! Now you can tell your parents "But Mom, Dad, I have to smoke the Ganj. I'm training to be an assassin!"

It is here used to describe the planned killing of a person... who has been selected by a resistance organization for death, and whose death provides positive advantages to that organization.

What was that flap with Pat Robertson and the Venezuelan President again a couple of weeks ago?...

"We have the ability to take him (Hugo Chavez) out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability," Robertson said Monday on the Christian Broadcast Network's The 700 Club.
"We don't need another $200 billion war to get rid of one, you know, strong-arm dictator," he continued. "It's a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with."

"You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it," Robertson said. "It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war ... and I don't think any oil shipments will stop." - USA Today (08/22/05)

Sweet, I was worried that the oil shipments would stop.

EMPLOYMENT

Assassination is an extreme measure not normally used in clandestine operations. It should be assumed that it will never be ordered or authorized by any U.S. Headquarters, though the latter may in rare instances agree to its execution by members of an associated foreign service.

That's it, don't authorize it yourself, but go ahead and participate if someone else orders it!

No assassination instructions should ever be written or recorded.

Hey, but writing a manual about it is ok!

JUSTIFICATION

Murder is not morally justifiable. Self-defense may be argued if the victim has knowledge which may destroy the resistance organization if divulged. Assassination of persons responsible for atrocities or reprisals may be regarded as just punishment. Killing a political leader whose burgeoning career is a clear and present danger to the cause of freedom may be held necessary.

Justifying assassinations. Wow. And I'm sure they're going to assassinate someone for the cause of "freedom".

But assassination can seldom be employed with a clear conscience. Persons who are morally squeamish should not attempt it.

That's right, it's not for the squeamish! Do you think they had potential assassins fill out a job application before hand?

CLASSIFICATIONS

The techniques employed will vary according to whether the subject is unaware of his danger, aware but unguarded, or guarded. They will also be affected by whether or not the assassin is to be killed with the subject hereafter,

Wow, they whack their own whackers!

This is an important point though. Most people who don't believe in government conspiracies (such as 9/11) seem to not believe in them because they don't think everybody that's involved with the conspiracy can keep quiet over time. I've brought up the point before that in a conspiracy that needed the assistance of a lot of people and that there would be fear that some might try to "rat" them out, the conspiracy planners could have already planned to whack those hired conspirators that they don't trust. It would also be a way to send a stern warning to their fellow conspirators to keep quiet or else.

assassinations in which the subject is unaware will be termed "simple"; those where the subject is aware but unguarded will be termed "chase"; those where the victim is guarded will be termed "guarded."

If the assassin is to die with the subject, the act will be called "lost." If the assassin is to escape, the adjective will be "safe."

How about classifying them as "sick", "twisted", "psychotic", and "MURDERER".

THE ASSASSIN

In lost assassination, the assassin must be a fanatic of some sort. Politics, religion, and revenge are about the only feasible motives. Since a fanatic is unstable psychologically, he must be handled with extreme care. He must not know the identities of the other members of the organization, for although it is intended that he die in the act, something may go wrong.

Yeah, it's probably best to stick with "sane" assassins!

TECHNIQUES

The essential point of assassination is the death of the subject.

What other point would there be for an assassination?

A human being may be killed in many ways but sureness is often overlooked by those who may be emotionally unstrung by the seriousness of this act they intend to commit. The specific technique employed will depend upon a large number of variables, but should be constant in one point: Death must be absolutely certain.

Got it. No "almost dead" subjects left behind.

Techniques may be considered as follows:

1. Manual.

It is possible to kill a man with the bare hands,

Sweet!

but very few are skillful enough to do it well. Even a highly trained Judo expert will hesitate to risk killing by hand unless he has absolutely no alternative. However, the simplest local tools are often much the most efficient means of assassination. A hammer, axe, wrench, screw driver, fire poker, kitchen knife, lamp stand, or anything hard, heavy and handy will suffice.

Who are the sick fucks who think of this stuff? I can just image their resume...

Employment History

Financial Analyst, Lenders Group, Inc

• Handled the collection and dissemination of financial data.

• Compiled and analyzed financial information for general ledger accounts.

• Installed, modified, and coordinated accounting systems and control procedures.

Marketing Manager, Trident Computers

• Worked closely with product marketing during development to ensure products were on time and on budget.

• Coordinated with Web team to develop web site and e-commerce logistics.

• Developed financial models including forecasting, margin analysis and pricing policy.

Assassination Script Writer, Central Intelligence Agency

• Sat around all day thinking up creative and effective ways to kill people.

2. Accidents.

The most efficient accident, in simple assassination, is a fall of 75 feet or more onto a hard surface.

Ouch!

Falls into the sea or swiftly flowing rivers may suffice if the subject cannot swim. It will be more reliable if the assassin can arrange to attempt rescue, as he can thus be sure of the subject's death and at the same time establish a workable alibi.

Got to admit, these script writers are sure thorough. I never would have thought to go swim out to someone I just threw in a river to go drown them some more!

3. Drugs.

All right, the good stuff!

An overdose of morphine administered as a sedative will cause death without disturbance and is difficult to detect. The size of the dose will depend upon whether the subject has been using narcotics regularly. If not, two grains will suffice.

Better give me three.

4. Edge Weapons

Absolute reliability is obtained by severing the spinal cord in the cervical region. This can be done with the point of a knife or a light blow of an axe or hatchet.

O-o-o-o-o-w, that just hurts thinking about it.

Another reliable method is the severing of both jugular...

Ok! I think we get the picture.

Now just think that this study was written up in the early 50's. Imagine all the creative assassination methods our CIA has thought up since.

Crap, I might be looking over my shoulder a little bit more now.




PS - Be sure to check out the Conference Room Technique at the bottom of the study. It's a fun exercise to do with a friend. And remember to leave some propaganda.

Killtown is 'CIA Free'!

And is a 'Non-Bogus' Website! Woo Hoo!

There are a couple of 9/11 truth websites that have pages that list other 9/11 truth websites that they caution against. One is called, "The CIA's Internet Fakes." It lists over a 100 websites (not all 9/11 truth sites) that, I guess, seems to think that all are somehow run, controlled, or influenced by the CIA. It says in part...

"...the government is running not only the 9/11 movement, but also controlling the 9/11 issue in the alternative media. It was relatively easy to do so, because they have controlled both mainstream and alternative media and politics increasingly over the last twenty years. This was just an extension of those operations.

Given the number of assets deployed in support of the 9/11 operation, and the operational requirements of the 9/11 attacks themselves, their origin is now clear. 9/11 was not carried out by some 'rogue group,' nor was it a fully official US Government-sanctioned operation.

But it was orchestrated by the highest levels of the US Military and military-industrial complex; on behalf of the national and international politicians, corporates, and moneyed interests. It had, and still has the full support of the US Military/intelligence apparatus -who control much of the alternative media and the 9/11 movement."

So if you read through their comprehensive list, you will see that Killtown is not on there. Killtown is "CIA free!" Yeah baby, I always knew I wasn't part of the CIA!

Another site has a page called, "Bogus 9/11 truth websites," which lists about 30 sites. It says in part...

"muddying the waters with phony claims to discredit the 9/11 Truth Movement

A tactic similar to (if not part of) the Karl Rove strategy of promoting true material wrapped in a package of lies, such as the supposedly fake documents that were given to CBS News that had the accurate conclusion that Bush went AWOL from the National Guard."

And once again, if you look through their list, you'll see that Killtown is not listed. Killtown is not a "bogus" website. (Whew!)

Now I have nothing against these sites and I've even used some of their research on my site. I'm not even disagreeing that some of these websites on their lists are making a mockery of 9/11 truthers (heck, some of you might think my site is a mockery!). I'm just poking a little fun at them because if you've been following the 9/11 skeptics or truth movement (which ever you prefer) at all, you'll notice that we are our own worst enemy. There is so much obsessive infighting and bickering that it seems like just about everybody, at one point or another, has pointing fingers at each other claiming that they're a "government shill" or "disinfo agent." No one trusts anybody. No one knows who to trust. I mean come on people, can't we all just get along?!

Now I'm not saying that no person or website is a "shill" or has poor research to "muddy the waters." I even think that some of these 9/11 truthers who argue that a Boeing 757 did crash into the Pentagon have pretty weak arguments (and I'm sure they disagree with some of my arguments), but just because we disagree on one of the many areas of interest revolving around 9/11 doesn't mean I necessarily think any less of them or that they should be thought of as "shady" or "controlled by the CIA."

It seems like some 9/11 truthers spend more time trying to "expose" other 9/11 truthers then using their time and talents to expose what we are all trying to expose, that 9/11 was an inside job.

Killtown has never operated in a manner to point fingers at other 9/11 truther sites I disagree with. I try to list 9/11 truther sites on my 9/11 Links page regardless of whether I agree with them or not. I'll let my viewers choose who they trust or not.

I hope that some of my fellow 9/11 truthers can put aside their personal differences (and pride) for just one second to learn how to disagree in a cordial manner if they do disagree with each other and focus more on what we agree with so we can peacefully co-exist and work together, not against each other, to achieve our ultimate goal; exposing the 9/11 fraud.

I hope some of those who have gotten caught up in the finger pointing phenomena will take a step back, swallow their pride and offer an olive branch to the one's that they have a problem with now or in the past. I also hope that the people who are being offered an olive branch will step up to the plate and except it.

In the meantime, I'm going to do what I've always done, spend my time more constructively to help prove that 9/11 was an inside job.

Are you with me?

Oops, one thing on the CIA Internet Fakes page I just saw...

Note: We do not contend that everyone associated with these websites are knowing intelligence operatives. Some have been professionally manipulated, others merely misled. In any event these are promoting the psyop agendas and disinformation themes of the covert controllers. This is also not meant to be a fully comprehensive listing of all the fake websites.

Uh oh, their list isn't a "fully comprehensive listing," so maybe they just haven't listed me yet? Maybe Killtown isn't "CIA free" after all?!

Well, at least I'm not a crackpot.

London Bombings Archive

Fatal mistakes that cost de Menezes his life (08/18/05)

Official: No link found in London blasts (08/16/05)

Leading cleric says Muslims being unjustly blamed for war on terrorism and the eight London bombing suspects "could have been innocent passengers" (07/28/05)

Terror Watch: Blair Opposes 9/11-Style Probe (07/27/05)

Two of the suicide bombers booked whitewater rafting trip a week before the attacks (07/25/05)

Expose truth, says leader of 9/11 inquiry (07/24/05)

UK police say more innocents could die in bomb hunt (07/25/05)

Prison Planet.com / Infowars Under Attack For London Bombing Coverage (07/22/05)

Coincidence of bomb exercises? (07/17/05) See also: Prison Planet's: Whitewash London Underground Exercise Story

London bombers may have been duped into killing themselves so their secrets stayed hidden (07/16/05)

Who shorted British pound? Currency fell 6% in 10 days before London terror attacks (07/16/05) Flashback: Put options placed on stocks days before 9/11

Alleged London suicide bomber cried for 9/11 victims

Iranian cleric said British government could have orchestrated last week's bombings in London (07/15/05)

London Bombs May Have Been Suicide Attacks...'evidence suggests...four suicide bombers of Pakistani origin' (07/12/05)

Islamist terrorists probably carried out attacks, says Blair (07/12/05)

"I was in tube bomb carriage - and survived" "The policeman said 'mind that hole, that's where the bomb was'. The metal was pushed upwards as if the bomb was underneath the train. They seem to think the bomb was left in a bag, but I don't remember anybody being where the bomb was, or any bag," he said. (07/11/05)

U.K.'s Blair Rejects Call for Probe of London Blasts (07/11/05)

Video: Bombing exercises in London underground took place at same time as real attack - PrisonPlanet.com Flashback: NORAD ran a war game exercise on morning of 9/11 called "Vigilant Guardian" in which the military participants thought the first hijacking was "part of the exercise"

Bomb drill occurred same time as London bombs (07/10/05)

Massive anti-terror exercise carried out last April in London's transport systems included 'bombs' being placed on buses and explosives left on the London underground (07/10/05)

Novel about a London terrorist bombing published same day as attacks, Author: timing was "a horrible coincidence" (07/09/05)

Ariel Sharon imposes gag order on his cabinet over London bombings (07/08/05)

AP story said Israeli embassy tipped off before yesterday's attack (07/08/05)

Benjamin Netanyahu was near London blast (07/08/05)

Rudy Giuliani near London blast (07/08/05)

9/11 mayor 'yards from London blast' (07/07/05)

2004 Election Archive

Noe transferred coin cash before giving to politicians (10/09/05)

Carter says Gore won 2000 election - Raw Story (09/22/05)

A Diebold Insider Speaks! - Brad Blog (09/15/05)

Ms. Noe's own scandal: Wife of Ohio GOP fundraiser does some election reform of her own - Raw Story (08/01/05)

US Supreme Court Nominee John Roberts Had Larger 2000 Florida Recount Role (07/27/05)

HIGHLY IRREGULAR , The Ohio election story is going to come back - New York Press (Vol 18, Issue 30)

Diebold rep gave $10,000 to county GOP (07/02/05)

2004 VOTE FRAUD FACTS SURFACE, Reporter Who Told Story of 2004 Vote Thievery Hushed by Mainstream Media Mogul (07/02/05)

Test shows voter fraud is possible, Machines are vulnerable to manipulation (06/04/05)

Jim Lampley: '04 Presidential election was "the biggest crime in the history of the nation" (05/10/05)

Investigators Find Evidence of Voter Fraud (05/10/05)

Investigators find evidence of voter fraud in Milwaukee (05/10/05)

Kerry: Trickery Kept Voters from Polls (04/11/05)

Hackers May Have Won Bush Office: Kerry's Wife (04/10/05)

Analysis of the 2004 Presidential Election Exit Poll Discrepancies (03/31/05)

Scientific Analysis Suggests US Presidential Vote Counts May Have Been Altered (03/31/05)

Voting glitches haunt statistician (03/04/05)

A Corrupted Election: Despite what you may have heard, the exit polls were right (02/15/05)

Ohio's Odd Numbers: Here is "non-wacko" evidence that something went seriously awry in the Buckeye State on Election Day 2004 (02/05)

Problems Found With '04 Exit Polls (01/19/05)

Democrats challenge Ohio electoral votes (01/06/05)

Jessie Jackson: "You could rig the machines. We have reason to believe it was rigged." (12/30/04)

Ohio Electors Cast Votes For Bush (12/14/04)

Ohio Certifies Two Percentage-Point Election Victory for President Bush After Recount, 118,775-vote lead (12/07/04)

Ohio Certifies Bush As Winner by Nearly 119,000 Votes; Third-Party Candidates Seeking Recount (12/06/04)

In sworn affidavit, programmer says he developed vote-rigging prototype for Florida congressman - Blue Lemur (12/06/04)

Texas to Florida: White House-linked clandestine operation paid for "vote switching" software - Online Journal (12/06/04)

Diebold GEMS Central Tabulator Vote Database Vote Modification - US Cert, National Cyber Alert System (09/1-7/04)

More on the buying of electoral fraud by the Bush campaign - Online Journal (11/26/04)

Saudis, Enron money helped pay for US rigged election - Online Journal (11/25/04)

Major bugs found in Diebold vote systems (11/12/04)

Conspiracy Theories Abound After Election (11/18/04)

Evidence Mounts That The Vote May Have Been Hacked (11/06/04)

Error With Electronic Voting System Gives Bush 3,893 Extra Votes in Ohio, Officials Say (11/05/04)

How did exit polls start avalanche of inaccuracy? (11/05/04)

Bush Wins Second Term, Kerry Concedes Defeat (11/04/04)

Bush Gives Victory Speech, Kerry Concedes (11/03/04)

Bush camp claims certainty of victory, Kerry campaign not conceding Ohio (11/03/04)

Egg On Face of Exit Pollsters (11/03/04)

Television networks trip over Ohio (11/03/04)

Blogs Blamed for Exit Poll Fiasco, first wave showed Kerry with lead of three points in Florida and four in Ohio (11/03/04)

Early exit polls come under fire, Zogby exit polls declared Kerry the winner in Ohio (11/03/04)

Report of Kerry lead scares stock market (11/02/04)

OHIO Election Night 2004: Race Summary (Bush / Kerry -- 2,859,768 / 2,741,167 -- 50.81% / 48.71%)

Slate: National exit poll, Kerry leads Bush 51-48, leads Ohio and Florida by one (11/02/04)

Zogby: Bush Leads 4% in Ohio (11/01/04)

Zogby: Bush Leads 5% in Ohio (10/30/04)

Zogby: Bush Leads 1% in Ohio (10/29/04)

Bin Laden Says He Ordered 9/11 Attacks; injecting himself into campaign four days ahead of presidential elections (10/29/04)

Zogby: Kerry Leads 3% in Ohio (10/28/04)

Zogby: Bush Leads 2% in Ohio (10/27/04)

Zogby: Bush Leads 5% in Ohio (10/24/04)

Poll: Advantage Kerry in Ohio Race (10/19/04)

Zogby: Kerry now leads in the race, Bush's Ohio lead slipping, Republican never won White House without Ohio (10/08/04)

Government terrorist warnings boost President Bush's approval ratings (10/04/04)

The trouble with e-voting, Political concerns have held back shares of Diebold (08/30/04)

E-Voting: Is The Fix In? Diebold has over 50 percent of the market (08/08/04)

Diebold halts top execs' political gifts (06/04/04)

Two voting companies & two brothers will count 80 percent of U.S. election using both scanners & touchscreens, Diebold and ES&S (04/28/04)

Diebold's Political Machine (03/05/04)

He wanted every vote to matter; Athan Gibbs, Sr. dies in crash (03/04/04) [Original]

Con Job at Diebold Subsidiary (12/17/03)

Edwards calls on Bush to return funds from Diebold exec, calling Bush to return more than $100,000 donated (11/16/03)

Diebold Executive to Keep Lower Profile, pummeled with national criticism for his close ties to the Bush re-election campaign (11/16/03)

Diebold Chief Exec committed to helping Ohio deliver electoral votes to Bush (08/28/03)

Diebold Corporate Headquarters - North Canton, Ohio